William E. Peel

447 citations
17 papers · 378 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
    • Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
    • Protein Structure and Dynamics
    • Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis

Papers in

William E. Peel

17 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

William E. Peel
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Molecular Biology 243
  • Biochemistry 25
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 25
  • Spectroscopy 45
  • Genetics 28
Replace Mathias Hoechli with:
Mathias Hoechli Russia
H. G. Weder Switzerland
I. Le Trong United States
Geoffrey A. Gilbert United Kingdom
M.H. Loucheux-Lefebvre France
Martin Wong United States
Ilana Tamir Israel
R. Lazo United States
G. A. J. van Os Netherlands
W. J. Pigram United Kingdom
William E. Peel relative to Mathias Hoechli Russia Mathias Hoechli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Mathias Hoechli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Peel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Peel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Peel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Peel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Peel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Peel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Peel. The network helps show where William E. Peel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside William E. Peel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Peel Line = papers co-authored together William E. Peel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1977129
2 198054
3 198043
4 197835
5 198018
6 198514
7 198213
8 197913
9 198313
10 197610
11 197810
12 19718
13 19837
14 19806
15 19912
16 19942
17 19751

About William E. Peel

William E. Peel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Organic Chemistry, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (5 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (3 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (2 papers), Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (2 papers) and Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (243 citations), Biochemistry (25 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (25 citations), Spectroscopy (45 citations) and Genetics (28 citations). William E. Peel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include D. Chapman, Benjamin R. Kingston, Terence H. Lilley, Anthony J. C. Fulford, Bruce Cornell, M. P. McDonald, A.E.R. Thomson, Peter J. Quinn, G. Wetherley‐Mein and Thomas D. Madden. Their work appears in journals such as Leukemia Research, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, Chemistry and Physics of Lipids, British Journal of Haematology and European Journal Of Haematology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact