William E. Peel

447 total citations
17 papers, 378 citations indexed

About

William E. Peel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, William E. Peel has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 378 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 3 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in William E. Peel's work include Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (3 papers). William E. Peel is often cited by papers focused on Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (3 papers). William E. Peel collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. William E. Peel's co-authors include D. Chapman, Benjamin R. Kingston, Terence H. Lilley, Anthony J. C. Fulford, Bruce Cornell, A.E.R. Thomson, M. P. McDonald, Peter J. Quinn, G. Wetherley‐Mein and Thomas D. Madden and has published in prestigious journals such as FEBS Letters, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes.

In The Last Decade

William E. Peel

17 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
William E. Peel United Kingdom	11	243	70	60	45	34	17	378
H. G. Weder Switzerland	12	468 1.9×	30 0.4×	100 1.7×	82 1.8×	30 0.9×	16	698
Martin Wong United States	11	376 1.5×	27 0.4×	89 1.5×	31 0.7×	51 1.5×	20	566
M.H. Loucheux-Lefebvre France	14	467 1.9×	18 0.3×	82 1.4×	71 1.6×	23 0.7×	41	703
Mathias Hoechli Russia	10	569 2.3×	93 1.3×	70 1.2×	32 0.7×	49 1.4×	10	902
I. Le Trong United States	7	319 1.3×	50 0.7×	106 1.8×	26 0.6×	25 0.7×	7	844
H. Werner Germany	13	130 0.5×	20 0.3×	209 3.5×	58 1.3×	42 1.2×	57	585
R. Lazo United States	6	463 1.9×	51 0.7×	43 0.7×	39 0.9×	29 0.9×	8	589
A.M. Gennaro Argentina	16	159 0.7×	46 0.7×	55 0.9×	47 1.0×	14 0.4×	50	538
Katie Hardman United States	11	564 2.3×	25 0.4×	41 0.7×	44 1.0×	154 4.5×	14	785
Patrick P. Moh United States	10	370 1.5×	104 1.5×	16 0.3×	55 1.2×	9 0.3×	14	590

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Peel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Peel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Peel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Peel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Peel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Peel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Peel. The network helps show where William E. Peel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William E. Peel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William E. Peel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William E. Peel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William E. Peel. William E. Peel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Peel, William E., et al.. (1994). Heterogeneous X‐ray survival characteristics of lymphocytes in prolymphocytic leukaemia: Mathematical analysis distinguishing delayed cell death and true radioresistance. European Journal Of Haematology. 53(4). 223–231. 2 indexed citations

Wetherley‐Mein, G., et al.. (1991). Simplified quantitative estimation in vitro of lymphocyte radiosensitivity applied to patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Leukemia Research. 15(7). 577–589. 2 indexed citations

Thomson, A.E.R., et al.. (1985). The Intrinsic Radiosensitivity of Lymphocytes in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia, Quantitatively Determined Independently of Cell Death Rate Factors. International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics Chemistry and Medicine. 48(6). 943–961. 14 indexed citations

Peel, William E., et al.. (1983). The fatty acyl chain composition of human normal and leukaemic lymphocytes and its modulation by specialised hydrogenation. Leukemia Research. 7(2). 193–204. 7 indexed citations

Wetherley‐Mein, G., et al.. (1983). Colchicine ultrasensitivity of lymphocytes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. British Journal of Haematology. 54(1). 111–120. 13 indexed citations

Thomson, A.E.R., et al.. (1982). A Mathematical Model Resolving Normal Human Blood Lymphocyte Population X-ray Survival Curves into Six Components: Radiosensitivity, Death Rate and Size of Two Responding Subpopulations. International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics Chemistry and Medicine. 41(1). 15–32. 13 indexed citations

Peel, William E., et al.. (1980). Plasma membrane cholesterol regulates human lymphocyte cytotoxic function. European Journal of Immunology. 10(11). 821–827. 54 indexed citations

Peel, William E., et al.. (1980). Cholesterol content and fluidity of normal human and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia lymphocytes in relation to serum cholesterol level. Leukemia Research. 4(6). 601–610. 6 indexed citations

Madden, Thomas D., William E. Peel, Peter J. Quinn, & D. Chapman. (1980). The modulations of membrane fluidity by hydrogenation processes. IV. Homogeneous catalysis of liposomes using a water-soluble catalyst. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods. 2(1-2). 19–27. 18 indexed citations

10.

Fulford, Anthony J. C. & William E. Peel. (1980). Lateral pressures in biomembranes estimated from the dynamics of fluorescent probes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 598(2). 237–246. 43 indexed citations

11.

Cornell, Bruce, D. Chapman, & William E. Peel. (1979). Random close-packed arrays of membrane components. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids. 23(3). 223–237. 13 indexed citations

12.

Chapman, D., William E. Peel, & Peter J. Quinn. (1978). THE MODULATION OF BILAYER FLUIDITY BY POLYPEPTIDES AND HOMOGENEOUS CATALYSTS *. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 308(1). 67–84. 10 indexed citations

13.

Cornell, Bruce, et al.. (1978). The modulation of lipid bilayer fluidity by intrinsic polypeptides and proteins. FEBS Letters. 90(1). 29–35. 35 indexed citations

14.

Chapman, D., William E. Peel, Benjamin R. Kingston, & Terence H. Lilley. (1977). Lipid phase transitions in model biomembranes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 464(2). 260–275. 129 indexed citations

15.

McDonald, M. P. & William E. Peel. (1976). Solid and liquid crystalline phases in the sodium dodecyl sulphate + hexadecanoic acid + water system. Journal of the Chemical Society Faraday Transactions 1 Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases. 72(0). 2274–2274. 10 indexed citations

16.

McDonald, M. P. & William E. Peel. (1975). Investigation of lipid + water systems. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids. 15(1). 37–47. 1 indexed citations

17.

McDonald, M. P. & William E. Peel. (1971). Investigation of lipid + water systems. Part 4.—Proton magnetic resonance in an ordered lyotropic mesophase. Transactions of the Faraday Society. 67(0). 890–896. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact