William E. Moen

860 total citations
65 papers, 585 citations indexed

About

William E. Moen is a scholar working on Information Systems, Conservation and Library and Information Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, William E. Moen has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 585 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Information Systems, 14 papers in Conservation and 10 papers in Library and Information Sciences. Recurrent topics in William E. Moen's work include Digital and Traditional Archives Management (14 papers), Research Data Management Practices (12 papers) and Data Quality and Management (8 papers). William E. Moen is often cited by papers focused on Digital and Traditional Archives Management (14 papers), Research Data Management Practices (12 papers) and Data Quality and Management (8 papers). William E. Moen collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and China. William E. Moen's co-authors include Charles R. McClure, Jeonghyun Kim, Erin Stewart, John Carlo Bertot, Rada Mihalcea, Wenting Cheng, Lingzi Hong, Jiahui Wu, Bradd Hart and Robert B. O'Neal and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Communications of the ACM and Information Processing & Management.

In The Last Decade

William E. Moen

56 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William E. Moen United States 15 275 123 80 80 75 65 585
Stuart A. Sutton United States 12 305 1.1× 209 1.7× 97 1.2× 49 0.6× 51 0.7× 37 632
Lorcan Dempsey United Kingdom 16 425 1.5× 80 0.7× 115 1.4× 34 0.4× 120 1.6× 67 682
Maja Žumer Slovenia 12 311 1.1× 137 1.1× 51 0.6× 51 0.6× 49 0.7× 90 445
Jung‐ran Park United States 16 432 1.6× 226 1.8× 50 0.6× 76 0.9× 128 1.7× 43 689
Kristin Antelman United States 7 415 1.5× 53 0.4× 52 0.7× 21 0.3× 11 0.1× 18 723
Richard P. Smiraglia United States 12 246 0.9× 189 1.5× 21 0.3× 48 0.6× 35 0.5× 135 672
Brian Lavoie United States 13 311 1.1× 64 0.5× 32 0.4× 48 0.6× 127 1.7× 43 511
Marshall Breeding United States 12 668 2.4× 78 0.6× 211 2.6× 46 0.6× 24 0.3× 262 927
Hong Xie United States 14 447 1.6× 160 1.3× 54 0.7× 48 0.6× 17 0.2× 21 675
William Y. Arms United States 13 297 1.1× 119 1.0× 27 0.3× 44 0.6× 51 0.7× 38 507

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Moen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Moen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Moen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Moen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Moen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Moen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Moen. The network helps show where William E. Moen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William E. Moen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William E. Moen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William E. Moen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William E. Moen. William E. Moen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moen, William E., et al.. (2012). Support for Research Data Management among U.S. Academic Institutions: Results from a National Survey. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 2 indexed citations
2.
Kim, Jeonghyun, et al.. (2012). Digital curation in the academic library job market. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 49(1). 1–4. 15 indexed citations
3.
Moen, William E. & Cathy Nelson Hartman. (2009). Open Access: A New Paradigm for Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Access. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).
4.
Bertot, John Carlo, Charles R. McClure, & William E. Moen. (2004). Assessing digital libraries: Evaluation strategies, practices, and issues. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 41(1). 561–561. 1 indexed citations
5.
Moen, William E.. (2003). Interim Report for the Z-Interop Project The Z39.50 Interoperability Testbed. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations
6.
Moen, William E., et al.. (2003). Assessing metadata utilization: an analysis of MARC content designation use. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 171–180. 14 indexed citations
7.
Moen, William E.. (2003). No Longer Under Our Control: The Nature and Role of Standards in the 21st Century Library. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations
8.
Moen, William E., et al.. (2003). Understanding resource discovery design requirements for a statewide virtual library: Application of a technology adoption indicator. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 40(1). 529–530. 2 indexed citations
9.
Moen, William E.. (2002). Decomposing MARC 21 Records for Analysis. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations
10.
Moen, William E.. (2001). Improving Z39.50 Interoperability: Z39.50 Profiles and Testbeds for Library Applications.. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 3 indexed citations
11.
Moen, William E.. (2001). The metadata approach to accessing government information. Government Information Quarterly. 18(3). 155–165. 15 indexed citations
12.
McClure, Charles R., William E. Moen, & John Carlo Bertot. (1999). Descriptive assessment of information policy initiatives: The government information locator service (GILS) as an example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(4). 314–330. 5 indexed citations
13.
Moen, William E.. (1998). The development of ANSI/NISO Z39.50: a case study in standards evolution. UMI eBooks. 5 indexed citations
14.
Moen, William E., et al.. (1997). Assessing the Government Information Locator Service (GILS): A Multi-Method Approach for Evaluating Networked Services.. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. 34. 67–77. 2 indexed citations
15.
Moen, William E.. (1996). Standards policy for information infrastructure. Information Processing & Management. 32(6). 770–771. 19 indexed citations
16.
McClure, Charles R., et al.. (1994). Libraries and the Internet/Nren: Perspectives, Issues, and Challenges. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 9 indexed citations
17.
Moen, William E.. (1993). Information Technology Standards in the Federal Government: Components of Federal Information Policy.. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. 30. 25–31. 1 indexed citations
18.
McCook, Kathleen de la Peña & William E. Moen. (1992). Patterns of Program Selection: Ranked Factors in the Choice of a Master's Degree Program in Library and Information Studies. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 33(3). 212–212. 6 indexed citations
19.
Moen, William E., et al.. (1992). Diversification of the Library and Information Science Entry Pool:. Journal of Library Administration. 16(1-2). 95–107. 4 indexed citations
20.
Moen, William E., et al.. (1988). The Class of 1988: Librarians for the New Millenium.. American libraries. 19(10). 858. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026