Countries citing papers authored by William E. Moen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Moen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Moen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Moen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Moen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Moen. The network helps show where William E. Moen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William E. Moen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William E. Moen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William E. Moen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William E. Moen. William E. Moen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moen, William E., et al.. (2012). Support for Research Data Management among U.S. Academic Institutions: Results from a National Survey. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).2 indexed citations
Moen, William E. & Cathy Nelson Hartman. (2009). Open Access: A New Paradigm for Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Access. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).
Moen, William E.. (2003). Interim Report for the Z-Interop Project The Z39.50 Interoperability Testbed. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
6.
Moen, William E., et al.. (2003). Assessing metadata utilization: an analysis of MARC content designation use. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 171–180.14 indexed citations
7.
Moen, William E.. (2003). No Longer Under Our Control: The Nature and Role of Standards in the 21st Century Library. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
Moen, William E.. (2002). Decomposing MARC 21 Records for Analysis. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
10.
Moen, William E.. (2001). Improving Z39.50 Interoperability: Z39.50 Profiles and Testbeds for Library Applications.. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).3 indexed citations
Moen, William E.. (1998). The development of ANSI/NISO Z39.50: a case study in standards evolution. UMI eBooks.5 indexed citations
14.
Moen, William E., et al.. (1997). Assessing the Government Information Locator Service (GILS): A Multi-Method Approach for Evaluating Networked Services.. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. 34. 67–77.2 indexed citations
McClure, Charles R., et al.. (1994). Libraries and the Internet/Nren: Perspectives, Issues, and Challenges. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).9 indexed citations
17.
Moen, William E.. (1993). Information Technology Standards in the Federal Government: Components of Federal Information Policy.. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. 30. 25–31.1 indexed citations
Moen, William E., et al.. (1988). The Class of 1988: Librarians for the New Millenium.. American libraries. 19(10). 858.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.