William E. McDermott

651 citations
31 papers · 507 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

William E. McDermott

29 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

William E. McDermott
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Spectroscopy 222
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 386
  • Bioengineering 30
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 106
  • Catalysis 21
Replace Ronald R. Bousek with:
Ronald R. Bousek United States
A L S Smith United Kingdom
V D Nikolaev Russia
B. Hemmerling Switzerland
C. E. Wiswall United States
Benjamin D. Prince United States
V Yu Baranov Russia
Ronald B. Cohen United States
G G Petrash Russia
Nikolai N Yuryshev Russia
William E. McDermott relative to Ronald R. Bousek United States Ronald R. Bousek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ronald R. Bousek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. McDermott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. McDermott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. McDermott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. McDermott. The network helps show where William E. McDermott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside William E. McDermott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. McDermott Line = papers co-authored together William E. McDermott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978343
2 201154
3 199715
4 199710
5 20049
6 19978
7 19788
8 19947
9 19977
10 20056
11 19925
12 19934
13 19984
14 19933
15 20033
16 19753
17 20023
18 19792
19 20002
20 19761

About William E. McDermott

William E. McDermott is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials and Catalysis, having authored 31 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Design and Applications (20 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (7 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (6 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (3 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (3 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (2 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (222 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (386 citations), Bioengineering (30 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (106 citations) and Catalysis (21 citations). William E. McDermott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include D. J. Benard, N. R. Pchelkin, Ronald R. Bousek, Corinne Lengsfeld, R. D. Coombe, John C. Stephens, Charles P. Nash, Tiankai Yang, John A. Stephens and Peter J. Laz. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Physics Letters, Transactions of the IMF, Applied Physics Letters, Applied Spectroscopy and Applied Thermal Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact