William E. Lynch

1.3k citations
67 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Lynch

66 papers receiving 906 citations

Peers

William E. Lynch
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 222
  • Physiology 53
  • Aquatic Science 69
  • Signal Processing 97
  • Ecology 196
Replace Glenn Stone with:
Glenn Stone Australia
Tian Gao China
Yanfeng Wang China
Hiroshi Suzuki Japan
Qi Yu China
Dagang Chen China
Zhigang Wu China
Fekadu Yadetie Norway
Jeffrey S. Prince United States
Weimin Feng China
William E. Lynch relative to Glenn Stone Australia Glenn Stone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Glenn Stone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Lynch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Lynch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Lynch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Lynch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Lynch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Lynch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Lynch. The network helps show where William E. Lynch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Lynch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Lynch Line = papers co-authored together William E. Lynch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970124
2 1967110
3 199755
4 197247
5 196846
6 196743
7 198841
8 197939
9 199738
10 197931
11 198030
12
The 7.1 S nuclear DNA polymerase and DNA replication in intact liver.
197630
13 198926
14 197326
15 199724
16 198622
17 199119
18 199219
19
Nuclear DNA polymerases of human carcinomas.
197718
20 200017

About William E. Lynch

William E. Lynch is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Data Compression Techniques (25 papers), Video Coding and Compression Technologies (23 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (10 papers), Image and Video Quality Assessment (9 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (8 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (6 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (5 papers) and Digital Filter Design and Implementation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (222 citations), Physiology (53 citations), Aquatic Science (69 citations), Signal Processing (97 citations) and Ecology (196 citations). William E. Lynch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Irving Lieberman, David L. Johnson, Albert I. Lansing, George P. Sartiano, Konrad Dąbrowski, Susan G. Langreth, Roger F. Brown, Tho Le‐Ngoc, I Lieberman and Robert M. DePhilip. Their work appears in journals such as North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Signal Processing Image Communication, Journal of Biological Chemistry, The Journal of Antibiotics and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact