William E. Hockley

3.5k total citations
82 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

William E. Hockley is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, William E. Hockley has authored 82 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 67 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 papers in Social Psychology and 17 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in William E. Hockley's work include Memory Processes and Influences (53 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (23 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (12 papers). William E. Hockley is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (53 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (23 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (12 papers). William E. Hockley collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. William E. Hockley's co-authors include Steve Joordens, Angela Consoli, Roger Ratcliff, Gail McKoon, Bennet B. Murdock, Carolina Cristi, Fahad N. Ahmad, Sukhvinder S. Obhi, Zeynep Barlas and Philip Servos and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Review and Experimental Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

William E. Hockley

73 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William E. Hockley Canada 28 2.0k 591 584 472 428 82 2.3k
Steve Joordens Canada 27 1.8k 0.9× 465 0.8× 759 1.3× 506 1.1× 249 0.6× 62 2.5k
Richard Cooper United Kingdom 22 885 0.4× 432 0.7× 540 0.9× 358 0.8× 285 0.7× 96 1.7k
Hubert D. Zimmer Germany 32 2.3k 1.1× 933 1.6× 847 1.5× 725 1.5× 200 0.5× 114 3.1k
Chad S. Dodson United States 30 2.5k 1.3× 1.1k 1.8× 470 0.8× 410 0.9× 439 1.0× 76 2.7k
David E. Huber United States 24 1.4k 0.7× 358 0.6× 293 0.5× 474 1.0× 263 0.6× 71 1.7k
Kim Kirsner Australia 30 2.3k 1.1× 350 0.6× 1.3k 2.3× 896 1.9× 417 1.0× 102 3.0k
Scott D. Gronlund United States 23 2.0k 1.0× 1.1k 1.9× 330 0.6× 345 0.7× 518 1.2× 63 2.5k
Geoff Ward United Kingdom 23 1.4k 0.7× 169 0.3× 403 0.7× 517 1.1× 338 0.8× 49 1.8k
Chris Westbury Canada 26 2.2k 1.1× 556 0.9× 1.2k 2.1× 1.1k 2.3× 499 1.2× 70 3.4k
Gregory V. Jones United Kingdom 21 1.2k 0.6× 294 0.5× 543 0.9× 481 1.0× 255 0.6× 80 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Hockley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Hockley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Hockley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Hockley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Hockley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Hockley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Hockley. The network helps show where William E. Hockley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William E. Hockley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William E. Hockley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William E. Hockley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William E. Hockley. William E. Hockley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Humphreys, Michael S., William E. Hockley, & Kerry A. Chalmers. (2023). Recognition memory: The probe, the returned signal, and the decision. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 31(2). 568–598.
2.
Neath, Ian, et al.. (2021). Stimulus-based mirror effects revisited.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 48(12). 1833–1849. 9 indexed citations
3.
Hockley, William E., et al.. (2020). In support of selective rehearsal: Double-item presentation in item-method directed forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 27(3). 529–535. 17 indexed citations
4.
Hockley, William E., et al.. (2019). Diffusion modeling of interference and decay in auditory short-term memory. Experimental Brain Research. 237(8). 1899–1905. 1 indexed citations
5.
Aßfalg, André, Daniel M. Bernstein, & William E. Hockley. (2017). The revelation effect: A meta-analytic test of hypotheses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 24(6). 1718–1741. 7 indexed citations
6.
Jamieson, Randall K., D. J. K. Mewhort, & William E. Hockley. (2016). A computational account of the production effect: Still playing twenty questions with nature.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 70(2). 154–164. 33 indexed citations
7.
Jones, Jeffery A., et al.. (2015). Overwriting and intrusion in short-term memory. Memory & Cognition. 44(3). 435–443. 4 indexed citations
8.
Hockley, William E., et al.. (2014). TMS-induced neural noise in sensory cortex interferes with short-term memory storage. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 8.
9.
Hogeveen, Jeremy, et al.. (2014). TMS-induced neural noise in sensory cortex interferes with short-term memory storage in prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 8. 23–23. 1 indexed citations
10.
Hockley, William E., et al.. (2014). A shared short-term memory system for stimulus duration and stimulus frequency.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 68(4). 236–241. 3 indexed citations
11.
Hockley, William E., et al.. (2012). Irrelevant sensory stimuli interfere with working memory storage: Evidence from a computational model of prefrontal neurons. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 13(1). 23–34. 5 indexed citations
12.
Hockley, William E., et al.. (2012). Can vibrotactile working memory store multiple items?. Neuroscience Letters. 514(1). 31–34. 8 indexed citations
13.
Hockley, William E., et al.. (2012). Diffusion modeling of interference in vibrotactile working memory. Neuroreport. 23(4). 255–258. 4 indexed citations
14.
Hockley, William E., et al.. (2012). The longer we have to forget the more we remember: The ironic effect of postcue duration in item-based directed forgetting.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 39(3). 691–699. 39 indexed citations
15.
Hockley, William E., et al.. (2011). Vibrotactile Working Memory as a Model Paradigm for Psychology, Neuroscience, and Computational Modeling. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 5. 162–162. 7 indexed citations
16.
Hockley, William E.. (2008). The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 34(6). 1412–1429. 76 indexed citations
17.
Hockley, William E., et al.. (2007). Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: Evidence for within-list criterion changes. Memory & Cognition. 35(4). 679–688. 27 indexed citations
18.
Hockley, William E., et al.. (2007). A test of two different revelation effects using forced-choice recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 14(6). 1096–1100. 9 indexed citations
19.
Hockley, William E. & Carolina Cristi. (1996). Tests of the separate retrieval of item and associative information using a frequency-judgment task. Memory & Cognition. 24(6). 796–811. 31 indexed citations
20.
Hockley, William E.. (1994). Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition. 22(6). 713–722. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026