William DeBois

875 citations
31 papers · 602 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

William DeBois

30 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

William DeBois
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Biochemistry 298
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 174
  • Emergency Medicine 155
  • Internal Medicine 33
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 56
Replace Gordon R. DeFoe with:
Gordon R. DeFoe United States
Cantwell Clark United States
Richard J Forest United States
Ariane Willems Belgium
Caroline Gerrard United Kingdom
Paul W. Weldner United States
Étienne de Médicis Canada
Antoine Rochon Canada
Norwood Wi United States
Ingo Slottosch Germany
William DeBois relative to Gordon R. DeFoe United States Gordon R. DeFoe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Gordon R. DeFoe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William DeBois

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William DeBois's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William DeBois with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William DeBois more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William DeBois

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William DeBois. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William DeBois. The network helps show where William DeBois may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William DeBois, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William DeBois Line = papers co-authored together William DeBois links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201815
2 201722
3 201513
4 20155
5 201420
6 20136
7 201310
8 20132
9 201331
10 20101
11
2010 John H. Gibbon Lecture. Just say yes!
20100
12 20067
13 200216
14 199899
15 199897
16 19962
17 199660
18 19957
19 198726
20 19872

About William DeBois

William DeBois is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Biochemistry, Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, having authored 31 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (12 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (12 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (9 papers), Blood transfusion and management (6 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (4 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (298 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (174 citations), Emergency Medicine (155 citations), Internal Medicine (33 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (56 citations). William DeBois has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Karl H. Krieger, O. Wayne Isom, Robert E. Helm, Todd K. Rosengart, Arash Salemi, Nasser K. Altorki, Samuel J. Lang, Dimitrios V. Avgerinos, M E Vega Gómez and Nilda M. García. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology, Perfusion, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and International Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026