William Clarkson

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 858 citations indexed

About

William Clarkson is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, William Clarkson has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 858 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 2 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in William Clarkson's work include Digital Media Forensic Detection (3 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (2 papers) and Digital and Cyber Forensics (2 papers). William Clarkson is often cited by papers focused on Digital Media Forensic Detection (3 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (2 papers) and Digital and Cyber Forensics (2 papers). William Clarkson collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. William Clarkson's co-authors include Edward W. Felten, Nadia Heninger, J. Alex Halderman, Joseph A. Calandrino, William Paúl, Jacob Appelbaum, Seth David Schoen, Ariel J. Feldman, Tim Weyrich and Adam Finkelstein and has published in prestigious journals such as Communications of the ACM, USENIX Security Symposium and Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).

In The Last Decade

William Clarkson

7 papers receiving 799 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Lest we remember

2009 513 citations J. Alex Halderman, Seth David Schoen et al. Communications of the ACM profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
William Clarkson United States	4	604	347	296	209	193	8	858
Seth David Schoen United States	4	633 1.0×	373 1.1×	309 1.0×	196 0.9×	234 1.2×	7	878
Frederik Armknecht Germany	18	544 0.9×	322 0.9×	118 0.4×	175 0.8×	270 1.4×	54	859
Mike Hamburg United States	8	615 1.0×	255 0.7×	303 1.0×	224 1.1×	237 1.2×	12	786
Ariel J. Feldman United States	9	943 1.6×	540 1.6×	380 1.3×	227 1.1×	377 2.0×	16	1.2k
Diego F. Aranha Brazil	13	508 0.8×	272 0.8×	85 0.3×	59 0.3×	319 1.7×	66	736
R. Thomas United States	9	412 0.7×	229 0.7×	285 1.0×	669 3.2×	900 4.7×	12	1.4k
Sangho Lee United States	14	709 1.2×	332 1.0×	425 1.4×	197 0.9×	282 1.5×	39	917
Mohammed El‐Hajj Netherlands	9	190 0.3×	338 1.0×	140 0.5×	57 0.3×	292 1.5×	41	599
Moritz Lipp Austria	13	1.2k 2.0×	343 1.0×	706 2.4×	507 2.4×	363 1.9×	18	1.4k
Cynthia Irvine United States	13	735 1.2×	289 0.8×	450 1.5×	345 1.7×	407 2.1×	38	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by William Clarkson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Clarkson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Clarkson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Clarkson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Clarkson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Clarkson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Clarkson. The network helps show where William Clarkson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Clarkson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Clarkson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Clarkson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Clarkson. William Clarkson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Felten, Edward W. & William Clarkson. (2012). Breaking assumptions: distinguishing between seemingly identical items using cheap sensors. 3 indexed citations

2.

Calandrino, Joseph A., William Clarkson, & Edward W. Felten. (2011). Bubble trouble: off-line de-anonymization of bubble forms. USENIX Security Symposium. 18–18. 3 indexed citations

3.

Clarkson, William, et al.. (2009). Fingerprinting Blank Paper Using Commodity Scanners. UCL Discovery (University College London).

4.

Calandrino, Joseph A., William Clarkson, & Edward W. Felten. (2009). Some consequences of paper fingerprinting for elections. 9–9. 4 indexed citations

5.

Halderman, J. Alex, Seth David Schoen, Nadia Heninger, et al.. (2009). Lest we remember. Communications of the ACM. 52(5). 91–98. 513 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Clarkson, William, Tim Weyrich, Adam Finkelstein, et al.. (2009). Fingerprinting Blank Paper Using Commodity Scanners. 301–314. 54 indexed citations

7.

Halderman, J. Alex, Seth David Schoen, Nadia Heninger, et al.. (2008). Lest we remember: cold boot attacks on encryption keys. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 43(5). 45–60. 280 indexed citations

8.

Clarkson, William, et al.. (1965). Hazard of Intravenous Plastic Cannulae. BMJ. 2(5455). 235.2–235. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact