Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Empirical Regularities in the Poverty-Environment Relationship of Rural Households: Evidence from Zimbabwe
Countries citing papers authored by William Cavendish
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William Cavendish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Cavendish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Cavendish more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Cavendish
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Cavendish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Cavendish. The network helps show where William Cavendish may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Cavendish
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Cavendish.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Cavendish based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William Cavendish. William Cavendish is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Cavendish, William. (2001). Empirical Regularities in the Poverty-Environment Relationship of Rural Households: Evidence from Zimbabwe. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
2.
Cavendish, William. (2000). Empirical Regularities in the Poverty-Environment Relationship of Rural Households: Evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development. 28(11). 1979–2003.565 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Richards, Michael, Jon Davies, & William Cavendish. (1999). Can PRA methods be used to collect economic data? A non-timber forest product case study from Zimbabwe. 36. 34–40.8 indexed citations
4.
Cavendish, William. (1999). The Country Captain.2 indexed citations
5.
Davies, Jocelyn, Michael Richards, & William Cavendish. (1999). Beyond the limits of PRA? A comparison of participatory and conventional and economic research methods in the analysis of ilala palm use in south eastern Zimbabwe.5 indexed citations
Anderson, David G. & William Cavendish. (1992). Efficiency and substitution in pollution abatement: Three case studies. World Bank discussion papers. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).2 indexed citations
9.
Anderson, Dennis & William Cavendish. (1992). Efficiency and Substitution in Pollution Abatement: Three Case Studies. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.4 indexed citations
10.
Adam, Christopher, et al.. (1991). Can privatization succeed? : economic structure and programme design in eight Commonwealth countries. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.