William Cathery
Impact in
-
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
-
- Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer 2
- Cancer-related gene regulation 1
-
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 4
- Co-authors
- Paolo Madeddu (9 shared papers)Paola Campagnolo (1 shared paper)Eirini Velliou (1 shared paper)Ashton Faulkner (4 shared papers)Davide Maselli (1 shared paper)Elisa Avolio (6 shared papers)Massimo Caputo (4 shared papers)Valeria Vincenza Alvino (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (2 papers)Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (1 paper)Antioxidants and Redox Signaling (1 paper)Stem Cells (1 paper)Free Radical Biology and Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalySpain
In The Last Decade
William Cathery
9 papers receiving 284 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Biomaterials 86
- Neurology 20
- Genetics 24
- Biomedical Engineering 100
- Surgery 85
Countries citing papers authored by William Cathery
This map shows the geographic impact of William Cathery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Cathery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Cathery more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Cathery
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Cathery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Cathery. The network helps show where William Cathery may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Cathery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 143 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 5 |
About William Cathery
William Cathery is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomaterials, Surgery, Genetics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (4 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (3 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (2 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (1 paper), Tracheal and airway disorders (1 paper), Cancer-related gene regulation (1 paper) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (86 citations), Neurology (20 citations), Genetics (24 citations), Biomedical Engineering (100 citations) and Surgery (85 citations). William Cathery has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Paolo Madeddu, Paola Campagnolo, Eirini Velliou, Ashton Faulkner, Davide Maselli, Elisa Avolio, Massimo Caputo, Valeria Vincenza Alvino, Anita C. Thomas and Eva Jover. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, Stem Cells and Free Radical Biology and Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.