William C. Michel

961 total citations
32 papers, 752 citations indexed

About

William C. Michel is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, William C. Michel has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 752 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Sensory Systems, 17 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 12 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in William C. Michel's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (21 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (17 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (12 papers). William C. Michel is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (21 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (17 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (12 papers). William C. Michel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. William C. Michel's co-authors include Jeffrey G. Edwards, Charles D. Derby, James F. Case, Frank S. Corotto, Richard K. Zimmer‐Faust, Holly S. Cate, DA Lipschitz, Pascal Steullet, MJ Sanderson and Kathleen E. Whitlock and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Journal of Neurophysiology and Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

William C. Michel

32 papers receiving 722 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William C. Michel United States 18 425 323 169 136 123 32 752
Eckart Zeiske Germany 15 391 0.9× 484 1.5× 255 1.5× 150 1.1× 116 0.9× 18 889
Gail D. Burd United States 20 566 1.3× 579 1.8× 258 1.5× 117 0.9× 185 1.5× 29 1.1k
Alan Nighorn United States 19 857 2.0× 194 0.6× 73 0.4× 172 1.3× 235 1.9× 36 1.1k
Joseph G. Dulka Canada 19 306 0.7× 179 0.6× 93 0.6× 92 0.7× 213 1.7× 26 1.3k
Hisayo Sadamoto Japan 21 747 1.8× 99 0.3× 34 0.2× 261 1.9× 239 1.9× 36 1.1k
Frédéric Laberge Canada 16 217 0.5× 136 0.4× 54 0.3× 135 1.0× 76 0.6× 43 689
Seth M. Tomchik United States 16 483 1.1× 292 0.9× 256 1.5× 125 0.9× 137 1.1× 28 900
Tine Valentinĉic Slovenia 13 204 0.5× 234 0.7× 168 1.0× 68 0.5× 14 0.1× 21 488
Bradley G. Rehnberg United States 13 75 0.2× 129 0.4× 119 0.7× 93 0.7× 33 0.3× 19 441
K. B. Døving Norway 14 298 0.7× 411 1.3× 190 1.1× 50 0.4× 29 0.2× 18 622

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Michel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Michel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Michel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Michel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Michel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Michel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Michel. The network helps show where William C. Michel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Michel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Michel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Michel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Michel. William C. Michel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lucero, Mary T., et al.. (2008). Cross‐Species Comparison of Metabolite Profiles in Chemosensory Epithelia: An Indication of Metabolite Roles in Chemosensory Cells. The Anatomical Record. 291(4). 410–432. 3 indexed citations
2.
Michel, William C., et al.. (2008). Odorant Responsiveness of Squid Olfactory Receptor Neurons. The Anatomical Record. 291(7). 763–774. 18 indexed citations
3.
Edwards, Jeffrey G., et al.. (2007). Cholinergic innervation of the zebrafish olfactory bulb. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 504(6). 631–645. 19 indexed citations
4.
Michel, William C., et al.. (2006). Heterogeneous distribution of taste cells in facial and vagal nerve-innervated taste buds. Neuroscience. 138(1). 339–350. 2 indexed citations
5.
Michel, William C., et al.. (2005). Morphological and biochemical heterogeneity in facial and vagal nerve innervated taste buds of the channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 486(2). 132–144. 8 indexed citations
6.
Sanderson, MJ, et al.. (2005). Isolation and characterization of the laure olfactory behavioral mutant in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Developmental Dynamics. 234(1). 229–242. 45 indexed citations
7.
Sakata, Yoko, et al.. (2003). Assessment of neuronal maturation and acquisition of functional competence in the developing zebrafish olfactory system. Methods in Cell Science. 25(1-2). 39–48. 13 indexed citations
8.
Edwards, Jeffrey G. & William C. Michel. (2003). Pharmacological characterization of ionotropic glutamate receptors in the zebrafish olfactory bulb. Neuroscience. 122(4). 1037–1047. 22 indexed citations
9.
Edwards, Jeffrey G. & William C. Michel. (2002). Odor‐stimulated glutamatergic neurotransmission in the zebrafish olfactory bulb. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 454(3). 294–309. 63 indexed citations
10.
Steullet, Pascal, Holly S. Cate, William C. Michel, & Charles D. Derby. (2000). Functional units of a compound nose: Aesthetasc sensilla house similar populations of olfactory receptor neurons on the crustacean antennule. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 418(3). 270–270. 2 indexed citations
12.
Michel, William C., et al.. (1999). High-resolution functional labeling of vertebrate and invertebrate olfactory receptor neurons using agmatine, a channel-permeant cation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 90(2). 143–156. 32 indexed citations
13.
Michel, William C., et al.. (1997). Evidence of distinct amino acid and bile salt receptors in the olfactory system of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Brain Research. 764(1-2). 179–187. 28 indexed citations
14.
Michel, William C., et al.. (1995). Specificity and sensitivity of the olfactory organ of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 177(2). 191–9. 70 indexed citations
15.
Corotto, Frank S. & William C. Michel. (1994). A hyperpolarization-activated cation conductance in lobster olfactory receptor neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. 72(1). 360–365. 12 indexed citations
16.
Bent, Stephen, et al.. (1994). [Management of indoor air pollution by polychlorinated biphenyl compounds exemplified by two Hagen schools].. PubMed. 56(7). 394–8. 4 indexed citations
17.
Michel, William C. & John Caprio. (1991). Responses of single facial taste fibers in the sea catfish, Arius felis, to amino acids. Journal of Neurophysiology. 66(5). 1–1. 3 indexed citations
18.
Michel, William C.. (1987). Mate Recognition by an Antarctic Isopod Crustaceana. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 510(1). 494–497. 2 indexed citations
19.
Zimmer‐Faust, Richard K., et al.. (1984). Chemical induction of feeding in California spiny lobster,Panulirus interruptus (Randall):. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 10(6). 957–971. 23 indexed citations
20.
Zimmer‐Faust, Richard K., et al.. (1984). CHEMICAL MEDIATION OF APPETITIVE FEEDING IN A MARINE DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN: THE IMPORTANCE OF SUPPRESSION AND SYNERGISM. Biological Bulletin. 167(2). 339–353. 60 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026