William C. McCormack

818 citations
19 papers · 503 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

William C. McCormack

18 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

William C. McCormack
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 145
  • Linguistics and Language 49
  • Language and Linguistics 105
  • Cultural Studies 51
  • Anthropology 59
Replace Janet W. D. Dougherty with:
Janet W. D. Dougherty United States
Charles O. Frake United States
James C. Faris United States
Gary Witherspoon United States
Bruce Mannheim United States
Brenda Farnell United States
Rik Pinxten Belgium
Giovanni Bennardo United States
John Kirkpatrick United States
Ellen B. Basso United States
William C. McCormack relative to Janet W. D. Dougherty United States Janet W. D. Dougherty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Janet W. D. Dougherty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William C. McCormack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. McCormack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. McCormack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. McCormack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. McCormack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. McCormack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. McCormack. The network helps show where William C. McCormack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside William C. McCormack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William C. McCormack Line = papers co-authored together William C. McCormack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1988226
2 1974101
3 197642
4 197830
5 197921
6 197713
7 197912
8 197812
9 19809
10 19659
11 19699
12 19666
13 19665
14 19742
15 19582
16 19811
17 19691
18 19571
19 19761

About William C. McCormack

William C. McCormack is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Linguistics and Language, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 19 papers that have together received 503 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South Asian Studies and Conflicts (3 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (2 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers), Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (2 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Agricultural Economics and Practices (2 papers) and Gender Studies in Language (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (145 citations), Linguistics and Language (49 citations), Language and Linguistics (105 citations), Cultural Studies (51 citations) and Anthropology (59 citations). William C. McCormack has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Janet W. D. Dougherty, S. Α. Wurm, Munro S. Edmonson, James W. Fernández, George G. Haydu, Alice Β. Kehoe, John Blacking, Charles K. Warriner, Roger W. Wescott and Alan Dundes. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, Language, Current Anthropology, The Journal of Pediatrics and African and Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact