William C. K. Mak
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 2%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Boris A. MalomedP.L. ChuPak L. ChuSean WalshPeter J. SnellingAntonio RieraDouglas MooteMichael Brimacombe
- Topics
- Nonlinear Photonic Systems (10 papers)Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (10 papers)Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Statistical and Nonlinear PhysicsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsElectrical and Electronic Engineering
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnnals of Emergency MedicineJournal of the Optical Society of America B
In The Last Decade
William C. K. Mak
15 papers receiving 407 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 389
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 347
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 118
- Computer Networks and Communications 35
- Molecular Biology 10
Countries citing papers authored by William C. K. Mak
This map shows the geographic impact of William C. K. Mak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. K. Mak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. K. Mak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William C. K. Mak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. K. Mak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. K. Mak. The network helps show where William C. K. Mak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. K. Mak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. K. Mak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. K. Mak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. K. Mak. William C. K. Mak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 54 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 46 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 93 | |
| 16 | 41 |
About William C. K. Mak
William C. K. Mak is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Pharmacology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Photonic Systems (10 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (10 papers) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (347 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (389 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (118 citations). William C. K. Mak has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Israel and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Boris A. Malomed, P.L. Chu, Pak L. Chu, Sean Walsh, Peter J. Snelling, Antonio Riera, Douglas Moote and Michael Brimacombe. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of Emergency Medicine and Journal of the Optical Society of America B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.