William C. Frayer

458 citations
28 papers · 307 indexed · h-index 12
Topics
Ocular Oncology and Treatments (8 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers)Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (5 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

William C. Frayer

27 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

William C. Frayer
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Ophthalmology 122
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 64
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 57
  • Surgery 55
  • Rheumatology 53
Replace William C. Lloyd with:
William C. Lloyd United States
Gilbert W. Cleasby United States
Frederick J. Elsas United States
Ian C. Francis Australia
Tova Monos Israel
Simeon A. Lauer United States
José Luis Tovilla-Canales Mexico
D. H. Nicholson United States
Matthew Lee-Wing Canada
J. Oscar Croxatto Argentina
William C. Frayer relative to William C. Lloyd United States William C. Lloyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
William C. Lloyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Frayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Frayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Frayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Frayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Frayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Frayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Frayer. The network helps show where William C. Frayer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Frayer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Frayer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Frayer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Frayer. William C. Frayer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 23
3 16
4
A goblet cell-rich variant of conjunctival mucoepidermoid carcinoma
1
5 18
6 2
7 2
8 7
9 19
10
The harderian gland: its tumors and its relevance to humans.
11
11 1
12
Some consequences of ciliary process swelling in the rabbit and in the human.
5
13 1
14 18
15 41
16 5
17 1
18 8
19 17
20 7

About William C. Frayer

William C. Frayer is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Equine and Developmental Biology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Oncology and Treatments (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (122 citations), Rheumatology (53 citations) and Dermatology (30 citations). William C. Frayer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Harold G. Scheie, Myron Yanoff, Stephen E. Orlin, Ralph C. Eagle, Katrinka L. Heher, Michael E. Sulewski, Lucy B. Rorke, Charles W. Nichols, Robert W. Weisenthal and Maarten S. Sibinga. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026