William C. Day

23 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

William C. Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Biotechnology 44
  • Hematology 36
  • Pharmacology 48
  • Virology 13
  • Biochemistry 17
Replace William J. Rôbbins with:
William J. Rôbbins United States
Jianhui Li China
N. J. Russell United Kingdom
Thaisa Francielle Souza Domingos Brazil
Qin Song China
O. B. Williams United States
Howard Rogers United Kingdom
Parul Mittal Australia
Lina Zhang China
Zhewen Zhang China
William C. Day relative to William J. Rôbbins United States William J. Rôbbins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
William J. Rôbbins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Day. The network helps show where William C. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside William C. Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William C. Day Line = papers co-authored together William C. Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197260
2 196351
3 196839
4 196335
5 196335
6 196333
7 197222
8 197221
9 195815
10 19539
11 19638
12 19535
13 19535
14 19755
15 19524
16 19523
17
Electron microscope studies of the virus of measles (morbilli).
19523
18 19602
19
Electron micrographs of erythrocytes from cotton rats infected with the Lansing strain of poliomyelitis virus.
20032
20 19522

About William C. Day

William C. Day is a scholar working on Virology, Molecular Biology, Animal Science and Zoology, Epidemiology and Hematology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rabies epidemiology and control (4 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers), Hemostasis and retained surgical items (3 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (3 papers), Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (3 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (3 papers), Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (2 papers) and Poxvirus research and outbreaks (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (44 citations), Hematology (36 citations), Pharmacology (48 citations), Virology (13 citations) and Biochemistry (17 citations). William C. Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include J. Gordon Erdman, Richard F. Berendt, George Just, F. Blank, Peter G. Barton, Mary R. Rolfs, Donald J. Hanahan, Michael J. Pelczar, Reginald L. Reagan and R. E. Allen. Their work appears in journals such as Science, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, Experimental Biology and Medicine and Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact