Citations per year, relative to William C. Dawson William C. Dawson (= 1×)
peers
Thomas C. Chidsey
Countries citing papers authored by William C. Dawson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Dawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Dawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Dawson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Dawson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Dawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Dawson. The network helps show where William C. Dawson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Dawson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Dawson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Dawson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Dawson. William C. Dawson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dawson, William C., et al.. (2015). Integration of Post-Frac Production Logging Data with Pre-Frac Static Petrophysical Description Enhances Reservoir Characterization.9 indexed citations
3.
Minty, M., William C. Dawson, R. Hulsart, et al.. (2011). Simultaneous Orbit, Tune, Coupling, and Chromaticity Feedback at RHIC.1 indexed citations
4.
Dawson, William C., et al.. (2010). Eagle Ford Shale Variability: Sedimentologic Influences on Source and Reservoir Character in an Unconventional Resource Unit.20 indexed citations
Dawson, William C., et al.. (2005). Shale Facies Variability and Sequence Stratigraphy: Application to Top Seal Prediction in Deepwater Depositional Systems. 55. 133–145.8 indexed citations
Dawson, William C., et al.. (1999). Top Seal Character and Sequence Stratigraphy of Selected Marine Shales in Gulf Coast Style Basins. 49.8 indexed citations
12.
Dawson, William C.. (1997). Limestone Microfacies and Sequence Stratigraphy: Eagle Ford Group (Cenomanian-Turonian)North-Central Texas Outcrops. 47.20 indexed citations
13.
Dawson, William C., et al.. (1996). Austin Chalk (Uppermost Santonian) Discontinuity Surface, North-Central Texas. AAPG Bulletin. 46(9). 1500.5 indexed citations
14.
Dawson, William C., et al.. (1995). Austin Chalk (!) Petroleum System: Upper Cretaceous, Southeastern Texas. AAPG Bulletin. 79(10).1 indexed citations
15.
Dawson, William C., et al.. (1995). Austin Chalk (!) Petroleum System Upper Cretaceous, Southeastern Texas: A Case Study. 45.11 indexed citations
16.
Dawson, William C., et al.. (1994). Sequence-stratigraphic elements and geochemical variability within a {open_quotes}condensed section{close_quotes}: Eagle Ford Group, east-central Texas. AAPG Bulletin. 78(9).4 indexed citations
17.
Dawson, William C.. (1988). Ismay Reservoirs, Paradox Basin: Diagenesis and Porosity Development.1 indexed citations
Dawson, William C. & Albert V. Carozzi. (1985). Experimental fabric-selective porosity in phylloid-algal limestones. AAPG Bulletin.1 indexed citations
20.
Dawson, William C., et al.. (1985). ICHNOLOGY AND PALEOENVIRONMENTS OF THE MIDDLE AND UPPER AUSTIN CHALK (UPPER CRETACEOUS), NORTHEASTERN TEXAS. 47–67.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.