William Byers

696 citations
29 papers · 530 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

William Byers

26 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

William Byers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Inorganic Chemistry 191
  • Oncology 288
  • Theoretical Computer Science 11
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 159
  • Organic Chemistry 219
Replace Christos Papadimitriou with:
Christos Papadimitriou Greece
Michael Laing South Africa
G.O. Carlisle United States
Robert S. Marianelli United States
Boston Wagner United States
Dinesh K. Patel United States
Anton Neubrand Germany
Richard Johnson United States
Dale A. Laidler United Kingdom
Chinh Q. Nguyen United Kingdom
William Byers relative to Christos Papadimitriou Greece Christos Papadimitriou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Christos Papadimitriou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Byers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Byers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Byers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Byers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Byers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Byers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Byers. The network helps show where William Byers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside William Byers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Byers Line = papers co-authored together William Byers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1968137
2 196988
3 197150
4 197247
5 197233
6 197228
7 201024
8 197221
9 198618
10 201113
11 19839
12 20108
13 19837
14 19797
15 19717
16 19806
17 19895
18 19834
19 19904
20
Ambiguity and Paradox in Mathematics.
20073

About William Byers

William Byers is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Geometry and Topology and Oncology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (9 papers), Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (5 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (4 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (4 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (3 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (3 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (2 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (191 citations), Oncology (288 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (11 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (159 citations) and Organic Chemistry (219 citations). William Byers has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include A. B. P. Lever, R. V. Parish, Ronald G. Cavell, Bodie E. Douglas, S. P. Perone, A. Boyarsky, John G. Jones, John McKnight, John O. Edwards and Ben S. Freiser. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Israel Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact