William Bosworth
- Infectious Diseases top 2%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Andrew R. MossErnest DruckerGary KalkutRuth A. McAdamBarry R. BloomDavid AllandJudith A. HahnJing Fang
- Topics
- Political Philosophy and Ethics (8 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers)Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
William Bosworth
15 papers receiving 906 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Infectious Diseases 675
- Epidemiology 608
- Surgery 425
- Health 129
- Sociology and Political Science 119
Countries citing papers authored by William Bosworth
This map shows the geographic impact of William Bosworth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Bosworth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Bosworth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Bosworth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Bosworth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Bosworth. The network helps show where William Bosworth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Bosworth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Bosworth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Bosworth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Bosworth. William Bosworth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | Does It Pay to Be Environmentally Responsible? Toxic Releases and Financial Performance | 12 |
| 13 | 163 | |
| 14 | Differential mortality in New York City (1988-1992). Part Two: excess mortality in the south Bronx. | 9 |
| 15 | 91 | |
| 16 | Transmission of Tuberculosis in New York City -- An Analysis by DNA Fingerprinting and Conventional Epidemiologic Methodsbreakdown → | 646 |
| 17 | 8 |
About William Bosworth
William Bosworth is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and General Social Sciences, having authored 17 papers that have together received 967 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (675 citations), Epidemiology (608 citations) and Health (129 citations). William Bosworth has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew R. Moss, Ernest Drucker, Gary Kalkut, Ruth A. McAdam, Barry R. Bloom, David Alland, Judith A. Hahn, Jing Fang, Shantha Madhavan and Michael H. Alderman. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.