William B. Redwine

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 961 citations indexed

About

William B. Redwine is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Paleontology. According to data from OpenAlex, William B. Redwine has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 961 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Cell Biology and 1 paper in Paleontology. Recurrent topics in William B. Redwine's work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (5 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (2 papers) and Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers). William B. Redwine is often cited by papers focused on Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (5 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (2 papers) and Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers). William B. Redwine collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. William B. Redwine's co-authors include Samara L. Reck‐Peterson, Ronald D. Vale, Andrew P. Carter, Andrés E. Leschziner, Laurence Florens, Michael P. Washburn, Selene K. Swanson, Julie Huang, Rogelio A. Hernández‐López and Joan Conaway and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

In The Last Decade

William B. Redwine

8 papers receiving 958 citations

Hit Papers

The cytoplasmic dynein transport machinery and its many c... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William B. Redwine United States 7 688 655 104 74 62 9 961
Ryo Nitta Japan 16 669 1.0× 783 1.2× 64 0.6× 84 1.1× 25 0.4× 28 1.0k
Kari Barlan United States 9 586 0.9× 626 1.0× 102 1.0× 103 1.4× 45 0.7× 12 955
Walter Huynh United States 11 730 1.1× 588 0.9× 80 0.8× 90 1.2× 41 0.7× 14 1.1k
Morgan E. DeSantis United States 15 890 1.3× 479 0.7× 86 0.8× 92 1.2× 34 0.5× 27 1.1k
L. Urnavicius United States 11 852 1.2× 898 1.4× 95 0.9× 82 1.1× 36 0.6× 14 1.2k
Tai Kiuchi Japan 12 611 0.9× 412 0.6× 68 0.7× 82 1.1× 32 0.5× 15 1.0k
Manuel Hilbert Switzerland 14 777 1.1× 537 0.8× 137 1.3× 80 1.1× 17 0.3× 17 1.1k
Masatoshi Esaki Japan 21 1.3k 1.9× 438 0.7× 65 0.6× 45 0.6× 144 2.3× 36 1.5k
Chiao‐Lin Chen United States 9 501 0.7× 546 0.8× 32 0.3× 72 1.0× 28 0.5× 10 860
María Maldonado United States 10 723 1.1× 468 0.7× 86 0.8× 40 0.5× 40 0.6× 16 927

Countries citing papers authored by William B. Redwine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William B. Redwine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William B. Redwine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William B. Redwine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William B. Redwine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William B. Redwine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William B. Redwine. The network helps show where William B. Redwine may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William B. Redwine

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William B. Redwine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William B. Redwine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William B. Redwine. William B. Redwine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Weber, C., et al.. (2025). A tool to dissect heterotypic determinants of homotypic protein phase behavior. Protein Science. 34(7). e70194–e70194.
2.
Redwine, William B., et al.. (2024). Graded FGF activity patterns distinct cell types within the apical sensory organ of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis. Developmental Biology. 510. 50–65. 2 indexed citations
3.
Kendrick, Agnieszka A., Andrea M. Dickey, William B. Redwine, et al.. (2019). Hook3 is a scaffold for the opposite-polarity microtubule-based motors cytoplasmic dynein-1 and KIF1C. The Journal of Cell Biology. 218(9). 2982–3001. 59 indexed citations
4.
Reck‐Peterson, Samara L., William B. Redwine, Ronald D. Vale, & Andrew P. Carter. (2018). The cytoplasmic dynein transport machinery and its many cargoes. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 19(6). 382–398. 437 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Reck‐Peterson, Samara L., William B. Redwine, Ronald D. Vale, & Andrew P. Carter. (2018). Publisher Correction: The cytoplasmic dynein transport machinery and its many cargoes. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 19(7). 479–479. 12 indexed citations
6.
Redwine, William B., Zaw Min Htet, Selene K. Swanson, et al.. (2017). The human cytoplasmic dynein interactome reveals novel activators of motility. eLife. 6. 105 indexed citations
7.
Toropova, Katerina, A. J. Roberts, William B. Redwine, et al.. (2014). Lis1 regulates dynein by sterically blocking its mechanochemical cycle. eLife. 3. 72 indexed citations
8.
Redwine, William B., et al.. (2012). Structural Basis for Microtubule Binding and Release by Dynein. Science. 337(6101). 1532–1536. 126 indexed citations
9.
Redwine, William B., Laurence Florens, Selene K. Swanson, et al.. (2008). Characterization of Cullin-box Sequences That Direct Recruitment of Cul2-Rbx1 and Cul5-Rbx2 Modules to Elongin BC-based Ubiquitin Ligases. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 283(12). 8005–8013. 148 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026