Willem‐Paul Brinkman

4.1k total citations
163 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Willem‐Paul Brinkman is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Willem‐Paul Brinkman has authored 163 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 53 papers in Social Psychology, 53 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 38 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Willem‐Paul Brinkman's work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (34 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (27 papers) and Usability and User Interface Design (17 papers). Willem‐Paul Brinkman is often cited by papers focused on Digital Mental Health Interventions (34 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (27 papers) and Usability and User Interface Design (17 papers). Willem‐Paul Brinkman collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia. Willem‐Paul Brinkman's co-authors include Mark A. Neerincx, Nexhmedin Morina, Yun Ling, Ingrid Heynderickx, Joost Broekens, Harold T. Nefs, Chao Qu, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Dwi Hartanto and Jyoti Choudrie and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Willem‐Paul Brinkman

157 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Willem‐Paul Brinkman Netherlands 27 734 697 570 492 345 163 2.6k
Corina Sas United Kingdom 31 1.4k 2.0× 515 0.7× 530 0.9× 517 1.1× 429 1.2× 149 3.1k
Denzil Ferreira Finland 30 584 0.8× 576 0.8× 207 0.4× 636 1.3× 192 0.6× 94 3.0k
David Coyle Ireland 33 674 0.9× 527 0.8× 732 1.3× 1.2k 2.5× 450 1.3× 105 3.9k
Daniela Villani Italy 26 1.0k 1.4× 524 0.8× 819 1.4× 392 0.8× 410 1.2× 93 3.3k
Dian Tjondronegoro Australia 26 258 0.4× 558 0.8× 298 0.5× 723 1.5× 265 0.8× 139 3.8k
Niels van Berkel Denmark 24 458 0.6× 313 0.4× 304 0.5× 309 0.6× 227 0.7× 147 2.1k
Gavin Doherty Ireland 35 680 0.9× 1.1k 1.5× 703 1.2× 1.9k 3.8× 305 0.9× 127 3.9k
Elisa D. Mekler Switzerland 27 697 0.9× 251 0.4× 499 0.9× 273 0.6× 191 0.6× 70 2.7k
Mark A. Neerincx Netherlands 32 609 0.8× 844 1.2× 1.7k 3.1× 516 1.0× 622 1.8× 243 4.4k
Clint Bowers United States 38 310 0.4× 494 0.7× 1.8k 3.1× 590 1.2× 365 1.1× 157 5.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Willem‐Paul Brinkman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Willem‐Paul Brinkman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Willem‐Paul Brinkman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Willem‐Paul Brinkman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Willem‐Paul Brinkman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Willem‐Paul Brinkman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Willem‐Paul Brinkman. The network helps show where Willem‐Paul Brinkman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Willem‐Paul Brinkman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Willem‐Paul Brinkman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Willem‐Paul Brinkman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Willem‐Paul Brinkman. Willem‐Paul Brinkman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fitrianie, Siska, et al.. (2025). The Artificial Social Agent Questionnaire (ASAQ) — Development and evaluation of a validated instrument for capturing human interaction experiences with artificial social agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 199. 103482–103482. 4 indexed citations
2.
Mérelle, Saskia, et al.. (2024). Breaking Down Barriers to a Suicide Prevention Helpline: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mental Health. 11. e56396–e56396. 1 indexed citations
3.
Brinkman, Willem‐Paul, et al.. (2023). Feasibility of generating structured motivational messages for tailored physical activity coaching. Frontiers in Digital Health. 5. 1215187–1215187. 4 indexed citations
4.
Fitrianie, Siska, et al.. (2023). Mandarin Chinese translation of the Artificial-Social-Agent questionnaire instrument for evaluating human-agent interaction. Frontiers in Computer Science. 5. 2 indexed citations
5.
Neerincx, Mark A., et al.. (2022). Users’ needs for a digital smoking cessation application and how to address them: A mixed-methods study. PeerJ. 10. e13824–e13824. 5 indexed citations
6.
Neerincx, Mark A., et al.. (2021). Natural language processing for cognitive therapy: Extracting schemas from thought records. PLoS ONE. 16(10). e0257832–e0257832. 11 indexed citations
7.
Neerincx, Mark A., et al.. (2019). Technological State of the Art of Electronic Mental Health Interventions for Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(1). e12599–e12599. 29 indexed citations
8.
Tielman, Myrthe L., et al.. (2017). How should a virtual agent present psychoeducation? Influence of verbal and textual presentation on adherence. Technology and Health Care. 25(6). 1081–1096. 43 indexed citations
9.
Brinkman, Willem‐Paul, et al.. (2015). Intelligent Virtual Agents : 15th International Conference, IVA 2015, Delft, The Netherlands, August 26-28, 2015, Proceedings. Springer eBooks. 2 indexed citations
10.
Fitrianie, Siska, et al.. (2012). Utilizing the Potential of the Affected Population and Prevalent Mobile Technology during Disaster Response: Propositions for a Literature Survey. TNO Repository. 3 indexed citations
11.
Ling, Yun, et al.. (2011). Cybersickness and anxiety in virtual environments. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 5 indexed citations
12.
Neerincx, Mark A. & Willem‐Paul Brinkman. (2010). Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. 3 indexed citations
13.
14.
Love, Steve, et al.. (2009). Does cognitive style affect student performance on a web-based course?. 3. 2 indexed citations
15.
Neerincx, Mark A., et al.. (2009). Collaborative situational mapping during emergency response. 6. 6 indexed citations
16.
Brinkman, Willem‐Paul, Reinder Haakma, & D.G. Bouwhuis. (2008). The theoretical foundation and validity of a component-based usability questionnaire. Behaviour and Information Technology. 28(2). 121–137. 24 indexed citations
17.
Khan, Iftikhar Ahmed, et al.. (2008). Towards a Computer Interaction-Based Mood Measurement Instrument. PPIG. 17. 5 indexed citations
18.
Choudrie, Jyoti, et al.. (2006). Diffusion theory and the digital divide in e-services: an empirical investigation of two local areas in the UK. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 707–719. 2 indexed citations
19.
Brinkman, Willem‐Paul, Reinder Haakma, & D.G. Bouwhuis. (2004). Consistency: a factor that links the usability of individual interaction components together. A & A Case Reports. 5(10). 169–72. 3 indexed citations
20.
Brinkman, Willem‐Paul, Reinder Haakma, & D.G. Bouwhuis. (2001). Usability evaluation of component-based user interfaces. TU/e Research Portal. 767–768. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026