Wido Nager

2.0k total citations
34 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Wido Nager is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Wido Nager has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Wido Nager's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (12 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (9 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (9 papers). Wido Nager is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (12 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (9 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (9 papers). Wido Nager collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Spain and United States. Wido Nager's co-authors include Thomas F. Münte, Eckart Altenmüller, Reinhard Dengler, Bernardina M. Wieringa, Sönke Johannes, Antoni Rodrı́guez-Fornells, Jascha Rüsseler, Detlef E. Dietrich, Josep Marco‐Pallarés and David Cucurell and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Neuroscience and NeuroImage.

In The Last Decade

Wido Nager

34 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wido Nager Germany 21 1.1k 399 304 198 157 34 1.5k
Donatella Scabini United States 17 2.0k 1.7× 418 1.0× 149 0.5× 249 1.3× 74 0.5× 19 2.4k
A. Braun United States 14 780 0.7× 318 0.8× 286 0.9× 58 0.3× 102 0.6× 19 1.1k
M.L.A. Jongsma Netherlands 20 1.2k 1.1× 191 0.5× 69 0.2× 268 1.4× 75 0.5× 51 1.6k
Mikhail Zvyagintsev Germany 25 1.1k 1.0× 393 1.0× 153 0.5× 174 0.9× 30 0.2× 56 1.5k
Stephanie J. Hevenor Canada 11 1.6k 1.4× 674 1.7× 156 0.5× 221 1.1× 186 1.2× 14 2.1k
Conny F. Schmidt Switzerland 14 1.3k 1.1× 396 1.0× 63 0.2× 229 1.2× 46 0.3× 19 1.7k
Edna C. Cieslik Germany 22 1.9k 1.7× 546 1.4× 213 0.7× 418 2.1× 107 0.7× 42 2.4k
Juri D. Kropotov Russia 24 1.9k 1.7× 263 0.7× 116 0.4× 796 4.0× 127 0.8× 117 2.3k
Valdas Noreika United Kingdom 24 1.4k 1.3× 357 0.9× 110 0.4× 367 1.9× 31 0.2× 48 1.8k
Kwang-Hyuk Lee United Kingdom 21 1.1k 1.0× 301 0.8× 208 0.7× 407 2.1× 49 0.3× 44 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Wido Nager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wido Nager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wido Nager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wido Nager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wido Nager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wido Nager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wido Nager. The network helps show where Wido Nager may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wido Nager

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wido Nager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wido Nager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wido Nager. Wido Nager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Münte, Thomas F., Josep Marco‐Pallarés, Marcus Heldmann, et al.. (2017). The human globus pallidus internus is sensitive to rewards – Evidence from intracerebral recordings. Brain stimulation. 10(3). 657–663. 16 indexed citations
2.
Marco‐Pallarés, Josep, Wido Nager, Ulrike M. Krämer, et al.. (2010). Neurophysiological markers of novelty processing are modulated by COMT and DRD4 genotypes. NeuroImage. 53(3). 962–969. 33 indexed citations
3.
Marco‐Pallarés, Josep, David Cucurell, Toni Cunillera, et al.. (2009). Genetic Variability in the Dopamine System (Dopamine Receptor D4, Catechol-O-Methyltransferase) Modulates Neurophysiological Responses to Gains and Losses. Biological Psychiatry. 66(2). 154–161. 73 indexed citations
4.
Nager, Wido, et al.. (2008). Attention to human speakers in a virtual auditory environment: Brain potential evidence. Brain Research. 1220. 164–170. 7 indexed citations
5.
Roy, Mandy, et al.. (2007). Skorbut — eine zu Unrecht vergessene Hypovitaminose. MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin. 149(45). 41–43. 1 indexed citations
6.
Nager, Wido, et al.. (2006). Crossmodal attention effects on brain responses to different stimulus classes. BMC Neuroscience. 7(1). 31–31. 10 indexed citations
7.
Schröder, Christine, et al.. (2006). Perception of emotional speech in Parkinson's Disease. Movement Disorders. 21(10). 1774–1778. 61 indexed citations
8.
Nager, Wido, et al.. (2003). Tracking of multiple sound sources defined by interaural time differences: brain potential evidence in humans. Neuroscience Letters. 344(3). 181–184. 46 indexed citations
9.
Müller, Sean, et al.. (2003). Selective Loss of Timbre Perception for Keyboard and Percussion Instruments Following a Right Temporal Lesion. Neurocase. 9(1). 86–93. 20 indexed citations
10.
Nager, Wido, et al.. (2003). The fate of sounds in conductors’ brains: an ERP study. Cognitive Brain Research. 17(1). 83–93. 67 indexed citations
11.
Nager, Wido, et al.. (2003). Preattentive evaluation of multiple perceptual streams in human audition. Neuroreport. 14(6). 871–874. 35 indexed citations
12.
Münte, Thomas F., et al.. (2003). Specialization of the Specialized: Electrophysiological Investigations in Professional Musicians. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 999(1). 131–139. 48 indexed citations
13.
Johannes, Sönke, Bernardina M. Wieringa, Wido Nager, et al.. (2002). Excessive action monitoring in Tourette syndrome. Journal of Neurology. 249(8). 961–966. 45 indexed citations
14.
Schultheiss, D., Sandra Müller, Wido Nager, et al.. (2001). Central effects of sildenafil (Viagra) on auditory selective attention and verbal recognition memory in humans: a study with event-related brain potentials. World Journal of Urology. 19(1). 46–50. 98 indexed citations
15.
Rüsseler, Jascha, et al.. (2001). Event-related brain potentials to sound omissions differ in musicians and non-musicians. Neuroscience Letters. 308(1). 33–36. 110 indexed citations
16.
Johannes, S., Bernardina M. Wieringa, Wido Nager, et al.. (2001). Electrophysiological measures and dual‐task performance in Tourette syndrome indicate deficient divided attention mechanisms. European Journal of Neurology. 8(3). 253–260. 29 indexed citations
17.
Johannes, Sönke, Bernardina M. Wieringa, Wido Nager, Reinhard Dengler, & Thomas F. Münte. (2001). Oxazepam alters action monitoring. Psychopharmacology. 155(1). 100–106. 65 indexed citations
18.
Nager, Wido, et al.. (2001). Human event-related potentials and distraction during selective listening. Neuroscience Letters. 297(1). 1–4. 10 indexed citations
19.
Münte, Thomas F., et al.. (2001). Superior auditory spatial tuning in conductors. Nature. 409(6820). 580–580. 95 indexed citations
20.
Johannes, Sönke, Bernardina M. Wieringa, Wido Nager, et al.. (2001). Discrepant target detection and action monitoring in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging. 108(2). 101–110. 152 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026