Weng-Tink Chooi
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Social Psychology
- Signal Processing top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lee A. ThompsonAamir Saeed MalikNidal KamelHafeez Ullah AminMuhammad HussainNasreen BadruddinRana Fayyaz AhmadBalasingam Vicknasingam
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers)Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and CognitionDrug and Alcohol DependenceMemory & Cognition
- Partner nations
- MalaysiaUnited StatesSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
Weng-Tink Chooi
28 papers receiving 724 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Cognitive Neuroscience 409
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 235
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 80
- Social Psychology 73
- Signal Processing 67
Countries citing papers authored by Weng-Tink Chooi
This map shows the geographic impact of Weng-Tink Chooi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Weng-Tink Chooi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Weng-Tink Chooi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Weng-Tink Chooi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Weng-Tink Chooi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Weng-Tink Chooi. The network helps show where Weng-Tink Chooi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Weng-Tink Chooi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Weng-Tink Chooi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Weng-Tink Chooi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Weng-Tink Chooi. Weng-Tink Chooi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 69 | |
| 17 | 231 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 82 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Weng-Tink Chooi
Weng-Tink Chooi is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 31 papers that have together received 759 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (409 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (235 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (45 citations). Weng-Tink Chooi has collaborated with scholars based in Malaysia, United States and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Lee A. Thompson, Aamir Saeed Malik, Nidal Kamel, Hafeez Ullah Amin, Muhammad Hussain, Nasreen Badruddin, Rana Fayyaz Ahmad, Balasingam Vicknasingam, Marek C. Chawarski and Darshan Singh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Memory & Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.