Weiping Yang

68 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

Weiping Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Sensory Systems 217
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 317
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 239
  • Social Psychology 165
  • Speech and Hearing 18
Replace Jinglong Wu with:
Jinglong Wu Japan
Emily B. J. Coffey Canada
William R. D’Angelo United States
Hannah B. Helbig Germany
Neil McLachlan Australia
Robert J. Zatorre Canada
Ewen MacDonald Denmark
Junji Watanabe Japan
G.M. van der Molen Netherlands
Stephanos Ioannou Saudi Arabia
Weiping Yang relative to Jinglong Wu Japan Jinglong Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jinglong Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Weiping Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Weiping Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Weiping Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Weiping Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Weiping Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Weiping Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Weiping Yang. The network helps show where Weiping Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Weiping Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Weiping Yang Line = papers co-authored together Weiping Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201747
2 201234
3 201732
4 202229
5 201626
6 202222
7 201821
8 201421
9 201517
10 201317
11 201017
12 201916
13 201614
14 202014
15 201813
16 201412
17 202011
18 201811
19 201310
20 20209

About Weiping Yang

Weiping Yang is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 76 papers that have together received 553 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multisensory perception and integration (50 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (39 papers), Color perception and design (30 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (6 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (217 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (317 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (239 citations), Social Psychology (165 citations) and Speech and Hearing (18 citations). Weiping Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Japan and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Yanna Ren, Jinglong Wu, Satoshi Takahashi, Yat Sze Choy, Xiaoyu Tang, Ying Li, Bin Wang, Takahiro Kimura, Tianyi Yan and Zhihan Xu. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Frontiers in Psychology, Neuroreport, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing and Perception.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact