Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Fault diagnosis of rotary machinery components using a stacked denoising autoencoder-based health state identification
2016660 citationsChen Lü, Zhenya Wang et al.Signal Processingprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Wei-Li Qin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wei-Li Qin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wei-Li Qin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wei-Li Qin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wei-Li Qin. The network helps show where Wei-Li Qin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wei-Li Qin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wei-Li Qin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wei-Li Qin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wei-Li Qin. Wei-Li Qin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.