Weijun Ding

899 citations
46 papers · 649 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Weijun Ding

44 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers

Weijun Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Biological Psychiatry 69
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 125
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 34
  • Gastroenterology 31
  • Physiology 145
Replace Jatinder Dhaliwal with:
Jatinder Dhaliwal India
Fuchun Wang China
Manoj Govindarajulu United States
Lei Xiong China
Koji Morishita Japan
Kyonghwan Choe Netherlands
Elisardo C. Vasquez Brazil
Tianle Gao China
Muhammed Yayla Türkiye
Weijun Ding relative to Jatinder Dhaliwal India Jatinder Dhaliwal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Jatinder Dhaliwal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Weijun Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Weijun Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Weijun Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Weijun Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Weijun Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Weijun Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Weijun Ding. The network helps show where Weijun Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Weijun Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Weijun Ding Line = papers co-authored together Weijun Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019147
2 2010108
3 201839
4 202134
5 201833
6 201826
7 202220
8 202220
9 202019
10 202218
11 202017
12 202112
13 202112
14 202311
15 202311
16 201011
17 202311
18 202411
19 202010
20 20238

About Weijun Ding

Weijun Ding is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Biological Psychiatry, Complementary and alternative medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 649 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gut microbiota and health (9 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (8 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (7 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (5 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (4 papers), Bioactive Compounds in Plants (4 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers) and Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (69 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (125 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (34 citations), Gastroenterology (31 citations) and Physiology (145 citations). Weijun Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, Macao and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Yili Wang, Youjun Yang, Xiuwen Xia, Zhanqiong Zhong, Baojia Wang, Ling Huang, Tao Ma, Hui Zhang, Shao Li and Jiao Lv. Their work appears in journals such as Life Sciences, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Behavioural Brain Research, European Journal of Pharmacology and Journal of Ethnopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact