This map shows the geographic impact of Weerakkody's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Weerakkody with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Weerakkody more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Weerakkody. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Weerakkody. The network helps show where Weerakkody may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Weerakkody
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Weerakkody.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Weerakkody based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Weerakkody. Weerakkody is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Weerakkody, et al.. (2014). Evaluating the public value of social innovation.1 indexed citations
2.
Azad, Bijan, et al.. (2013). The elicitation of key performance indicators of e-government providers: A bottom-up approach. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London).3 indexed citations
3.
Tsohou, Aggeliki, et al.. (2012). Evaluating e-Government services from a citizens' prespective: A reference process model. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London).1 indexed citations
4.
El‐Haddadeh, Ramzi, et al.. (2011). Diffusion of social cognitive theory in information systems research: A bibliometric study. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London).1 indexed citations
5.
Weerakkody, et al.. (2011). A conceptual study of the factors influencing e-inclusion. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London).9 indexed citations
6.
Al‐Shafi, Shafi & Weerakkody. (2010). Factors affecting e-government adoption in the state of Qatar. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London).117 indexed citations
7.
Weerakkody, et al.. (2010). THE ROLE OF INTERMEDIARIES IN FACILITATING E- GOVERNMENT DIFFUSION IN SAUDI ARABIA. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London).26 indexed citations
8.
Weerakkody, et al.. (2010). The e-government implementation directions in Oman: A preliminay investigation. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London).1 indexed citations
9.
Ali, Maged, Weerakkody, & Ramzi El‐Haddadeh. (2009). The impact of national culture on e-government implementation: A comparison case study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 137.26 indexed citations
10.
Weerakkody, et al.. (2009). E-government adoption in Qatar: An investigation of the citizens' perspective.8 indexed citations
11.
Kamal, Muhammad Mustafa, et al.. (2009). CURRENT STATE OF E-SERVICES IN SAUDI ARABIA: THE CASE OF INTERMEDIARIES IN FACILITATING GOVERNMENT SERVICES IN MADINAH CITY. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London).14 indexed citations
12.
Choudrie, Jyoti, Gheorghiță Ghinea, & Weerakkody. (2004). Evaluating global e-government sites: A view using web diagnostics tools. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London).79 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.