Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Fundamentals of Liquefaction under Cyclic Loading
1975425 citationsGeoffrey R. Martin, H. Bolton Seed et al.Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Divisionprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Wdl Finn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wdl Finn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wdl Finn more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wdl Finn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wdl Finn. The network helps show where Wdl Finn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wdl Finn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wdl Finn.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wdl Finn based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wdl Finn. Wdl Finn is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Prieto, Jorge, et al.. (2011). Base de datos de intensidades sísmicas para Colombia y el occidente de Venezuela. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 11(2).
2.
Finn, Wdl, et al.. (2004). Behavior of Piles in Liquefiable Soils During Earthquakes: Analysis and Design Issues.
3.
Finn, Wdl. (1999). EVOLUTION OF DYNAMIC ANALYSIS IN GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING. Rosa P: A digital library for transportation research (United States Department of Transportation).1 indexed citations
Finn, Wdl, et al.. (1991). Use of Piezoceramic Bender Elements in Soil Dynamics Testing. 118–133.4 indexed citations
7.
Finn, Wdl, et al.. (1991). USE OF PIEZOCERAMIC BENDER ELEMENTS IN SOIL DYNAMICS TESTING. RECENT ADVANCES IN INSTRUMENTATION, DATA ACQUISITION AND TESTING IN SOIL DYNAMICS. PROCEEDINGS OF SESSIONS SPONSORED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ASCE CONVENTION ORLANDO, FLORIDA. OCTOBER 21, 1991.3 indexed citations
Finn, Wdl & Shobha K Bhatia. (1980). Endochronic Theory of Sand Liquefaction.11 indexed citations
11.
Finn, Wdl, Y. P. Vaid, & Shobha K Bhatia. (1978). Constant Volume Cyclic Simple Shear Testing: Second International Conference on Microzonation for Safer Construction: Research and Applications.7 indexed citations
Martin, Geoffrey R., H. Bolton Seed, & Wdl Finn. (1975). Fundamentals of Liquefaction under Cyclic Loading. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division. 101(5). 423–438.425 indexed citations breakdown →
Finn, Wdl, et al.. (1958). NATURE AND MAGNITUDE OF SWELL PRESSURE. Highway Research Board Proceedings. 37.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.