Warren Kinghorn
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Joseph P. McEvoyMatthew D. McEvoyMichael BalboniTimothy P. DaalemanWarren P. NewtonKeith G. MeadorDan G. BlazerHarold G. Koenig
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAcademic MedicineThe Gerontologist
- Partner nations
- United StatesCambodiaIndia
In The Last Decade
Warren Kinghorn
26 papers receiving 308 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- General Health Professions 110
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 109
- Clinical Psychology 105
- Psychiatry and Mental health 95
- Sociology and Political Science 67
Countries citing papers authored by Warren Kinghorn
This map shows the geographic impact of Warren Kinghorn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Warren Kinghorn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Warren Kinghorn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Warren Kinghorn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Warren Kinghorn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Warren Kinghorn. The network helps show where Warren Kinghorn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Warren Kinghorn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Warren Kinghorn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Warren Kinghorn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Warren Kinghorn. Warren Kinghorn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | 54 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Warren Kinghorn
Warren Kinghorn is a scholar working on Family Practice, Clinical Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 29 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (22 citations), Health (55 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (95 citations). Warren Kinghorn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Cambodia and India. Frequent co-authors include Joseph P. McEvoy, Matthew D. McEvoy, Michael Balboni, Timothy P. Daaleman, Warren P. Newton, Keith G. Meador, Dan G. Blazer, Harold G. Koenig, P Gammon and Linda K. George. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Academic Medicine and The Gerontologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.