Ward E. Jones
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in ⓘ
- Philosophy 15
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 6
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 2
- Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art 2
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 5
- Co-authors
- Thaddeus Metz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Papers (3 papers)Synthese (2 papers)South African Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (1 paper)Journal of the history of philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- South AfricaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ward E. Jones
24 papers receiving 334 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Philosophy 155
- History and Philosophy of Science 22
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
- Cognitive Neuroscience 65
- Political Science and International Relations 69
Countries citing papers authored by Ward E. Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Ward E. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ward E. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ward E. Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ward E. Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ward E. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ward E. Jones. The network helps show where Ward E. Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Ward E. Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 211 | |
| 2 | Why Do We Value Knowledge | 1997 | 48 |
| 3 | 2000 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 19 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 14 | TheGoods and the Motivation of Believing | 2009 | 3 |
| 15 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 2 |
About Ward E. Jones
Ward E. Jones is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Law and Applied Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), African cultural and philosophical studies (3 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (2 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (155 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (22 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (65 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (69 citations). Ward E. Jones has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thaddeus Metz. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Papers, Synthese, South African Journal of Philosophy, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science and Journal of the history of philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.