Wanting Chen

2.9k citations
59 papers · 595 · h-index 15

Impact in

    • Click Chemistry and Applications
    • Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
    • Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions
    • Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal

Papers in

    • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 3
    • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 3
    • Click Chemistry and Applications 4
    • Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 3

Wanting Chen

51 papers receiving 581 citations

Peers

Wanting Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Organic Chemistry 134
  • Pollution 41
  • Toxicology 11
  • General Decision Sciences 6
  • Neurology 25
Replace Cátia Silva with:
Cátia Silva Portugal
Michelle M. Vanlandingham United States
Qi Yao China
Siying Huang China
Xiaoyu Yu China
Aline Pic‐Taylor Brazil
Marika Mannerström Finland
Lele Wang China
Wanting Chen relative to Cátia Silva Portugal Cátia Silva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Cátia Silva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wanting Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wanting Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wanting Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wanting Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wanting Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wanting Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wanting Chen. The network helps show where Wanting Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wanting Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wanting Chen Line = papers co-authored together Wanting Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202171
2 200968
3 202237
4 202234
5 202131
6 202429
7 201123
8 202222
9 202118
10 202118
11 201918
12 201815
13 201715
14 202214
15 202314
16 202212
17 202211
18 201911
19 202110
20 20239

About Wanting Chen

Wanting Chen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Plant Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 59 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (5 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (3 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (3 papers) and Aldose Reductase and Taurine (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (134 citations), Pollution (41 citations), Toxicology (11 citations), General Decision Sciences (6 citations) and Neurology (25 citations). Wanting Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Lavinia Paternoster, Cathie Sudlow, Yuang Gu, Hongtao Xu, Shuning Zhang, Tingting Tan, Guang Yang, Peixiang Ma, Qinghua He and Ming Li. Their work appears in journals such as Forests, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Behavioural Brain Research, Cerebral Cortex and Journal of Visualized Experiments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact