Wallace De Witt
- Mechanics of Materials
- Earth-Surface Processes top 10%
- Atmospheric Science
- Mechanical Engineering
- Paleontology top 10%
- Co-authors
- E. BauerJohn M. DennisonWilliam A. OliverJohn Warfield HuddleF.J. FlanaganRonald R. CharpentierGeorge E. ClaypoolLarry D. Harris
- Topics
- Geological Studies and Exploration (11 papers)Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (9 papers)Geological formations and processes (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Wallace De Witt
18 papers receiving 213 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Mechanics of Materials 81
- Earth-Surface Processes 67
- Atmospheric Science 56
- Mechanical Engineering 51
- Paleontology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Wallace De Witt
This map shows the geographic impact of Wallace De Witt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wallace De Witt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wallace De Witt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wallace De Witt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wallace De Witt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wallace De Witt. The network helps show where Wallace De Witt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wallace De Witt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wallace De Witt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wallace De Witt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wallace De Witt. Wallace De Witt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | Paleotectonic investigations of the Mississippian system in the US. Part 2. Interpretive summary and special features of the Mississippian | 1 |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | Devonian of The Appalachian Basin, United States | 25 |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 71 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Wallace De Witt
Wallace De Witt is a scholar working on Geology, Earth-Surface Processes and Geochemistry and Petrology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological Studies and Exploration (11 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (9 papers) and Geological formations and processes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (67 citations), Paleontology (49 citations) and Geology (34 citations). Wallace De Witt has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include E. Bauer, John M. Dennison, William A. Oliver, John Warfield Huddle, F.J. Flanagan, Ronald R. Charpentier, George E. Claypool, Larry D. Harris, John F. Sutter and James W. Schmoker. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Geological Society of America Bulletin and AAPG Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.