W. Veltzke
- Surgery top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Oncology
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Hepatology top 10%
- Co-authors
- R. E. HintzeAndreas AdlerHassan Abou‐RebyehThomas J. VoglR. FélixRenate HammerstinglP. NeuhausR Felix
- Topics
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (7 papers)Esophageal and GI Pathology (4 papers)Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (4 papers)
- Journals
- EndoscopyDer ChirurgEuropean surgery. Supplement/European surgery
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
W. Veltzke
12 papers receiving 497 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Surgery 485
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 400
- Oncology 174
- Gastroenterology 82
- Hepatology 73
Countries citing papers authored by W. Veltzke
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Veltzke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Veltzke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Veltzke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Veltzke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Veltzke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Veltzke. The network helps show where W. Veltzke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Veltzke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Veltzke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Veltzke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Veltzke. W. Veltzke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 54 | |
| 2 | [Endoscopic therapy of ischemia-type biliary lesions in patients following orthotopic liver transplantation]. | 23 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 110 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 152 | |
| 8 | Outcome of mechanical lithotripsy of bile duct stones in an unselected series of 704 patients. | 53 |
| 9 | Endoscopic management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. | 51 |
| 10 | The wide-channel endoscope optimizes the success of emergency endoscopy. | 3 |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 11 |
About W. Veltzke
W. Veltzke is a scholar working on Transplantation, Gastroenterology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 522 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (7 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (4 papers) and Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (82 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (400 citations) and Surgery (485 citations). W. Veltzke has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. E. Hintze, Andreas Adler, Hassan Abou‐Rebyeh, Thomas J. Vogl, R. Félix, Renate Hammerstingl, P. Neuhaus, R Felix, Samuel Schmidt and Wolf O. Bechstein. Their work appears in journals such as Endoscopy, Der Chirurg and European surgery. Supplement/European surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.