W. T. Toner
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 1%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- Michael TowriePavel MatousekAnthony W. ParkerChensheng MaWai‐Ming KwokP.J. HOWARDD. PhillipsF. Martin
- Topics
- Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (19 papers)Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (17 papers)Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
W. T. Toner
73 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 529
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 502
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 307
- Organic Chemistry 227
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 214
Countries citing papers authored by W. T. Toner
This map shows the geographic impact of W. T. Toner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. T. Toner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. T. Toner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. T. Toner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. T. Toner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. T. Toner. The network helps show where W. T. Toner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. T. Toner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. T. Toner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. T. Toner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. T. Toner. W. T. Toner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35 | |
| 2 | 82 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 146 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 89 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About W. T. Toner
W. T. Toner is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (19 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (17 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (502 citations), Biophysics (164 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (134 citations). W. T. Toner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Towrie, Pavel Matousek, Anthony W. Parker, Chensheng Ma, Wai‐Ming Kwok, P.J. HOWARD, D. Phillips, F. Martin, David Phillips and J. W. Dundee. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.