W. R. Jonker

1.2k total citations
10 papers, 306 citations indexed

About

W. R. Jonker is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, W. R. Jonker has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 306 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 10 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 2 papers in Developmental Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in W. R. Jonker's work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (10 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (9 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (7 papers). W. R. Jonker is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (10 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (9 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (7 papers). W. R. Jonker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Ireland. W. R. Jonker's co-authors include E. O’Sullivan, Tim Cook, Jaideep J. Pandit, Michael R. J. Sury, Jeremy Radcliffe, H. Torevell, N. Lucas, R. G. Paul, F. Plaat and John Hitchman and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anaesthesia and Survey of Anesthesiology.

In The Last Decade

W. R. Jonker

10 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W. R. Jonker United Kingdom 8 237 167 82 82 66 10 306
M. Wang United Kingdom 6 150 0.6× 119 0.7× 50 0.6× 58 0.7× 39 0.6× 7 237
Nutchanart Bunchungmongkol Thailand 8 229 1.0× 188 1.1× 94 1.1× 182 2.2× 84 1.3× 23 401
Francisco Lobo Portugal 9 173 0.7× 59 0.4× 96 1.2× 60 0.7× 87 1.3× 39 249
N. Lucas United Kingdom 7 160 0.7× 109 0.7× 57 0.7× 80 1.0× 44 0.7× 20 268
Pether Jildenstål Sweden 9 118 0.5× 105 0.6× 83 1.0× 178 2.2× 85 1.3× 30 320
Robert Rudner Poland 6 223 0.9× 74 0.4× 98 1.2× 79 1.0× 116 1.8× 11 331
P. Annila Finland 9 270 1.1× 120 0.7× 111 1.4× 181 2.2× 59 0.9× 18 408
Krisztina Escallier United States 7 248 1.0× 142 0.9× 175 2.1× 44 0.5× 266 4.0× 10 382
Saima Kamal Pakistan 4 257 1.1× 139 0.8× 115 1.4× 85 1.0× 93 1.4× 5 351
Donald M. Mathews United States 10 153 0.6× 115 0.7× 63 0.8× 157 1.9× 64 1.0× 39 318

Countries citing papers authored by W. R. Jonker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. R. Jonker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. R. Jonker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. R. Jonker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. R. Jonker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. R. Jonker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. R. Jonker. The network helps show where W. R. Jonker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. R. Jonker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. R. Jonker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. R. Jonker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. R. Jonker. W. R. Jonker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Pandit, J. J., Jackie Andrade, D. Bogod, et al.. (2015). 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on Accidental Awareness During General Anaesthesia. Survey of Anesthesiology. 59(6). 277–278. 5 indexed citations
2.
3.
Pandit, Jaideep J., Jackie Andrade, D. Bogod, et al.. (2014). The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: protocol, methods and analysis of data. Anaesthesia. 69(10). 1078–1088. 23 indexed citations
4.
Pandit, Jaideep J., Jackie Andrade, D. Bogod, et al.. (2014). 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: protocol, methods, and analysis of data. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 113(4). 540–548. 38 indexed citations
5.
Pandit, Jaideep J., Jackie Andrade, D. Bogod, et al.. (2014). The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors. Anaesthesia. 69(10). 1089–1101. 82 indexed citations
7.
Jonker, W. R., et al.. (2014). Who operates when, where and on whom? A survey of anaesthetic‐surgical activity in Ireland as denominator of NAP5. Anaesthesia. 69(9). 961–968. 7 indexed citations
8.
Pandit, Jaideep J., Tim Cook, W. R. Jonker, & E. O’Sullivan. (2013). A national survey of anaesthetists (NAP5 Baseline) to estimate an annual incidence of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia in the UK. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 110(4). 501–509. 50 indexed citations
9.
Pandit, Jaideep J., Tim Cook, W. R. Jonker, & E. O’Sullivan. (2013). A national survey of anaesthetists (NAP5 Baseline) to estimate an annual incidence of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia in the UK. Anaesthesia. 68(4). 343–353. 51 indexed citations
10.
Pandit, J. J., Tim Cook, W. R. Jonker, & E. O’Sullivan. (2013). A National Survey of Anaesthetists (NAP5 Baseline) to Estimate an Annual Incidence of Accidental Awareness During General Anaesthesia in the UK. Survey of Anesthesiology. 57(6). 311–312. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026