W. M. Schreiber

57 total papers · 541 total citations
36 papers, 439 citations indexed

About

W. M. Schreiber is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, W. M. Schreiber has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 439 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 11 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 7 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in W. M. Schreiber's work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (7 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (7 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (7 papers). W. M. Schreiber is often cited by papers focused on Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (7 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (7 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (7 papers). W. M. Schreiber collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Israel. W. M. Schreiber's co-authors include S. G. Elkington, A. M. Levine, Harold O. Conn, L. F. Landovitz, M. K. Liou, Thomas R. Johnson, Yehiam Prior, Ercüment Özïzmïr, William Schaffner and Matthias Koenig and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Physical Review Letters and Circulation.

In The Last Decade

W. M. Schreiber

35 papers receiving 393 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
W. M. Schreiber 180 123 63 59 51 36 439
Sergio De Filippo 216 1.2× 21 0.2× 68 1.1× 3 0.1× 70 1.4× 43 445
Hüseyin Aytekin 14 0.1× 53 0.4× 104 1.7× 38 0.6× 4 0.1× 34 369
Ricardo Ribeiro 82 0.5× 49 0.4× 160 2.5× 23 0.4× 36 0.7× 24 424
Harjinder Singh 95 0.5× 119 1.0× 5 0.1× 5 0.1× 6 0.1× 50 468
Hiroki Matsui 22 0.1× 15 0.1× 188 3.0× 2 0.0× 5 0.1× 38 427
Ayan Mukhopadhyay 60 0.3× 45 0.4× 246 3.9× 12 0.2× 56 469
Richard L. Johnston 109 0.6× 36 0.3× 151 2.4× 5 0.1× 26 482
Robert Hardin 151 0.8× 13 0.1× 129 2.0× 5 0.1× 5 0.1× 29 488
M. C. Bergère 61 0.3× 14 0.1× 249 4.0× 14 0.2× 13 0.3× 24 370
Peter Lindblom 93 0.5× 36 0.3× 42 0.7× 24 0.4× 46 417

Countries citing papers authored by W. M. Schreiber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. M. Schreiber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. M. Schreiber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. M. Schreiber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. M. Schreiber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. M. Schreiber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. M. Schreiber. The network helps show where W. M. Schreiber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. M. Schreiber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. M. Schreiber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. M. Schreiber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. M. Schreiber. W. M. Schreiber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026