W. Keith Hoots
- Hematology top 0.2%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Genetics top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Hepatology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Cheng‐Hock TohBruce M. EwensteinCindy LeissingerDonna DiMicheleDiane J. NugentPhilip M. BlattGeorges‐Étienne RivardS. W. PIPE
- Topics
- Hemophilia Treatment and Research (44 papers)Platelet Disorders and Treatments (23 papers)Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (16 papers)
- Cited by
- HematologyInternal MedicineGenetics
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenCanada
In The Last Decade
W. Keith Hoots
95 papers receiving 4.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Hematology 2.5k
- Epidemiology 586
- Genetics 574
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 530
- Hepatology 410
Countries citing papers authored by W. Keith Hoots
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Keith Hoots's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Keith Hoots with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Keith Hoots more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Keith Hoots
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Keith Hoots. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Keith Hoots. The network helps show where W. Keith Hoots may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Keith Hoots
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Keith Hoots. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Keith Hoots based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Keith Hoots. W. Keith Hoots is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 90 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 222 | |
| 7 | 55 | |
| 8 | 82 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 54 | |
| 12 | 86 | |
| 13 | Towards Definition, Clinical and Laboratory Criteria, and a Scoring System for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation* On behalf of the Scientific Subcommittee on Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) of the ISTH | 34 |
| 14 | 102 | |
| 15 | 87 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 104 | |
| 20 | Comprehensive care for patients with hemophilia: an expanded role in reducing risk for human immunodeficiency virus. | 2 |
About W. Keith Hoots
W. Keith Hoots is a scholar working on Hematology, Genetics and Internal Medicine, having authored 97 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hemophilia Treatment and Research (44 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (23 papers) and Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (2.5k citations), Internal Medicine (356 citations) and Genetics (574 citations). W. Keith Hoots has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cheng‐Hock Toh, Bruce M. Ewenstein, Cindy Leissinger, Donna DiMichele, Diane J. Nugent, Philip M. Blatt, Georges‐Étienne Rivard, S. W. PIPE, Craig M. Kessler and Elena Santagostino. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and JAMA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.