W. Kähn

914 citations
44 papers · 663 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

W. Kähn

44 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

W. Kähn
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 389
  • Equine 57
  • Small Animals 224
  • Reproductive Medicine 85
  • Animal Science and Zoology 94
Replace J.S. Boyd with:
J.S. Boyd United Kingdom
G. C. van der Weyden Netherlands
M. Hässig Switzerland
E Grünert Germany
W. E. Vaala United States
R. Neil Hooper United States
Matt D. Miesner United States
Carolina Castagnetti Italy
Robert B. Hillman United States
GA Anderson Australia
W. Kähn relative to J.S. Boyd United Kingdom J.S. Boyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
J.S. Boyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Kähn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Kähn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Kähn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Kähn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Kähn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Kähn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Kähn. The network helps show where W. Kähn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Kähn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Kähn Line = papers co-authored together W. Kähn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Veterinary reproductive ultrasonography
199486
2 198972
3 200763
4 199253
5 200939
6 200933
7 200532
8 199021
9 200621
10 200819
11 200717
12 200616
13 200616
14 200715
15 200515
16 200714
17 200713
18 200512
19 201211
20
[Sonographic diagnosis of early pregnancy in horses, cattle, sheep, goats, swine, dogs and cats. Standard values and limitations].
199010

About W. Kähn

W. Kähn is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Small Animals, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 44 papers that have together received 663 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (24 papers), Animal health and immunology (11 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (7 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (7 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (6 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (5 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers) and Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (389 citations), Equine (57 citations), Small Animals (224 citations), Reproductive Medicine (85 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (94 citations). W. Kähn has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include U. Bleul, R.M. Kenney, Béatrice Lejeune, W. Leidl, D.H. Volkmann, Peter N. Thompson, M. Hässig, J. B. Hall, W. Dee Whittier and R. Kasimanickam. Their work appears in journals such as Theriogenology, Animal Reproduction Science, Reproduction in Domestic Animals, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association and Veterinary Record.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact