429 total citations 2 papers, 71 citations indexed
About
W. K. Spencer is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Paleontology and Oceanography.
According to data from OpenAlex, W. K. Spencer has authored 2 papers receiving a total of 71 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Aquatic Science, 1 paper in Paleontology and 1 paper in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in W. K. Spencer's work include Echinoderm biology and ecology (2 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (1 paper) and Marine and environmental studies (1 paper). W. K. Spencer is often cited by papers focused on Echinoderm biology and ecology (2 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (1 paper) and Marine and environmental studies (1 paper). W. K. Spencer collaborates with scholars based in United States. W. K. Spencer's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
This map shows the geographic impact of W. K. Spencer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. K. Spencer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. K. Spencer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. K. Spencer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. K. Spencer. The network helps show where W. K. Spencer may publish in the future.
1951·Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·W. K. Spencer
67
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.