W. G. Forrest
- Anthropology top 5%
- Archeology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Classics top 10%
- Topics
- Classical Antiquity Studies (17 papers)Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (5 papers)Byzantine Studies and History (3 papers)
- Cited by
- AnthropologyArcheologyClassics
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaEnvironmental ManagementThe Classical World
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
W. G. Forrest
22 papers receiving 79 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Anthropology 84
- Archeology 46
- Sociology and Political Science 24
- Political Science and International Relations 16
- Classics 15
Countries citing papers authored by W. G. Forrest
This map shows the geographic impact of W. G. Forrest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. G. Forrest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. G. Forrest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. G. Forrest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. G. Forrest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. G. Forrest. The network helps show where W. G. Forrest may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. G. Forrest
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. G. Forrest. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. G. Forrest based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. G. Forrest. W. G. Forrest is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Democracy and Oligarchy in Sparta and Athens | 0 |
| 2 | England in the Reign of King Henry the Eighth: A Dialogue Between Cardinal Pole and Thomas Lupset, Lecturer in Rhetoric at Oxford | 0 |
| 3 | The Tradition of Hippias’ Expulsion from Athens | 3 |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | A history of Sparta 950-192 B.C | 16 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | The Emergence of Greek Democracy: The Character of Greek Politics, 800-400 B.C. | 13 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | History of the Greek and Persian War | 3 |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About W. G. Forrest
W. G. Forrest is a scholar working on Anthropology, Classics and Archeology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 126 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (17 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (5 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (84 citations), Archeology (46 citations) and Classics (15 citations). W. G. Forrest has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm F. McGregor, Herodotus, J. Joel Farber and Peter Derow. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environmental Management and The Classical World.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.