W. Flameng
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Wolfgang SchäperΜ. BorgersB. WüstenJohan van LoonBharati ShivalkarTikma Tjandra-MagaC. PletsPaul Lewi
- Topics
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (6 papers)Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (5 papers)Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
W. Flameng
25 papers receiving 842 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 434
- Surgery 404
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 233
- Biomedical Engineering 209
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 147
Countries citing papers authored by W. Flameng
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Flameng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Flameng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Flameng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Flameng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Flameng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Flameng. The network helps show where W. Flameng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Flameng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Flameng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Flameng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Flameng. W. Flameng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 119 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Influence of an early adrenergic blockade on thrombotic infarct size and myocardial metabolism. | 4 |
| 5 | The use of a heparin removal device: a valid alternative to protamine. | 8 |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 273 | |
| 11 | 59 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About W. Flameng
W. Flameng is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 900 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (6 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (434 citations), Transplantation (37 citations) and Emergency Medicine (132 citations). W. Flameng has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Schäper, Μ. Borgers, B. Wüsten, Johan van Loon, Bharati Shivalkar, Tikma Tjandra-Maga, C. Plets, Paul Lewi, Paul Sergeant and Willem Daenen. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Circulation Research and Cardiovascular Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.