W. Diepenbrock
- Plant Science top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 1%
- Ecology top 5%
- Soil Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- G.-W. RathkeTorsten BehrensOlaf ChristenB. FeilKurt‐Jürgen HülsbergenJohannes MüllerKarla SchenzelWolf‐Dieter Kalk
- Topics
- Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica (17 papers)Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (13 papers)Sunflower and Safflower Cultivation (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyJapanSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
W. Diepenbrock
68 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Plant Science 1.9k
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
- Agronomy and Crop Science 681
- Ecology 548
- Soil Science 442
Countries citing papers authored by W. Diepenbrock
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Diepenbrock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Diepenbrock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Diepenbrock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Diepenbrock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Diepenbrock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Diepenbrock. The network helps show where W. Diepenbrock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Diepenbrock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Diepenbrock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Diepenbrock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Diepenbrock. W. Diepenbrock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | Energy balance in crop production. | 5 |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 47 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 126 | |
| 10 | 158 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | Yield and quality of sunflower as affected by row orientation, row spacing and plant density | 27 |
| 14 | Combining process- with architectural models: the simulation tool VICA | 8 |
| 15 | Development and control of Sisymbrium loeselii L. in glufosinate-tolerant winter rapeseed. | 1 |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About W. Diepenbrock
W. Diepenbrock is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science and Soil Science, having authored 71 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica (17 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (13 papers) and Sunflower and Safflower Cultivation (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (681 citations), Plant Science (1.9k citations) and Soil Science (442 citations). W. Diepenbrock has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include G.-W. Rathke, Torsten Behrens, Olaf Christen, B. Feil, Kurt‐Jürgen Hülsbergen, Johannes Müller, Karla Schenzel, Wolf‐Dieter Kalk, Steffen Biermann and Kristina Warnstorff. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Journal of Experimental Botany and Plant Cell & Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.