Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Introduction to Ceramics
19774.8k citationsW. D. Kingery, H. Kent Bowen et al.profile →
This map shows the geographic impact of W. D. Kingery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. D. Kingery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. D. Kingery more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. D. Kingery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. D. Kingery. The network helps show where W. D. Kingery may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. D. Kingery
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. D. Kingery.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. D. Kingery based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with W. D. Kingery. W. D. Kingery is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kingery, W. D.. (1993). The social and cultural contexts of new ceramic technologies.17 indexed citations
Kingery, W. D.. (1991). Japanese/American technological innovation : the influence of cultural differences on Japanese and American innovation in advanced materials : proceedings of the Symposium on Japanese/American Technological Innovation held December 1990 at the University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. Elsevier eBooks.1 indexed citations
4.
Kingery, W. D., et al.. (1986). Technology and style.9 indexed citations
5.
Kingery, W. D., et al.. (1986). High-technology ceramics : past, present, and future : the nature of innovation and change in ceramic technology.18 indexed citations
6.
Vandiver, Pamela B. & W. D. Kingery. (1984). Composition and structure of chinese song dynasty celadon glazes from longquan. American Ceramic Society bulletin. 63(4). 612–616.6 indexed citations
7.
Kingery, W. D. & Pamela B. Vandiver. (1983). SONG DYNASTY JUN (CHUN) WARE GLAZES.. American Ceramic Society bulletin. 62(11). 1269–1279.14 indexed citations
French, David N., et al.. (1960). Solidification of Sea Ice. Journal of Glaciology. 3(28). 745–761.1 indexed citations
15.
French, David N., et al.. (1960). Solidification of Sea Ice. Journal of Glaciology. 3(28). 745–761.19 indexed citations
16.
Kingery, W. D.. (1959). Property measurements at high temperatures : factors affecting and methods of measuring material properties at temperatures above 1400°C(2550°F). Wiley eBooks.9 indexed citations
Kingery, W. D.. (1955). Factors Affecting Thermal Stress Resistance of Ceramic Materials. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 38(1). 3–15.596 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Kingery, W. D.. (1955). Authors' Closure. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 38(9). 342–342.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.