W. D. Booth
Impact in
- Small Animals top 1%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
Papers in
-
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 17
-
- Hormonal and reproductive studies 15
- Co-authors
- L. E. A. ROWSON (4 shared papers)Richard D. Newcomb (2 shared papers)B.A. Baldwin (4 shared papers)Adroaldo José Zanella (1 shared paper)H. Karg (1 shared paper)P. E. Hughes (2 shared papers)J. D. Skinner (1 shared paper)R.F. Parrott (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Reproduction (15 papers)Journal of Endocrinology (10 papers)Animal Science (4 papers)Aggressive Behavior (2 papers)International Journal of Andrology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SlovakiaUnited KingdomCzechia
In The Last Decade
W. D. Booth
39 papers receiving 776 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Small Animals 255
- Animal Science and Zoology 277
- Agronomy and Crop Science 220
- Sensory Systems 102
- Reproductive Medicine 124
Countries citing papers authored by W. D. Booth
This map shows the geographic impact of W. D. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. D. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. D. Booth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. D. Booth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. D. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. D. Booth. The network helps show where W. D. Booth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside W. D. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1975 | 81 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 67 | |
| 3 | 1968 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1975 | 64 | |
| 5 | 1977 | 46 | |
| 6 | 1980 | 40 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 36 | |
| 8 | 1983 | 32 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 30 | |
| 10 | 1972 | 24 | |
| 11 | 1978 | 23 | |
| 12 | 1980 | 23 | |
| 13 | 1973 | 23 | |
| 14 | Endocrine and exocrine factors in the reproductive behaviour of the pig. | 1980 | 22 |
| 15 | 1983 | 20 | |
| 16 | 1972 | 20 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 17 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 16 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 16 | |
| 20 | 1986 | 16 |
About W. D. Booth
W. D. Booth is a scholar working on Small Animals, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Animal Science and Zoology, Genetics and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 842 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (17 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (15 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (10 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (8 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (7 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (5 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (4 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Assays (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (255 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (277 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (220 citations), Sensory Systems (102 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (124 citations). W. D. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include L. E. A. ROWSON, Richard D. Newcomb, B.A. Baldwin, Adroaldo José Zanella, H. Karg, P. E. Hughes, J. D. Skinner, R.F. Parrott, Roy N. Kirkwood and D.B. Gower. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction, Journal of Endocrinology, Animal Science, Aggressive Behavior and International Journal of Andrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.