Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Long-term decline in krill stock and increase in salps within the Southern Ocean
2004900 citationsAngus Atkinson, Volker Siegel et al.Natureprofile →
Effects of sea-ice extent and krill or salp dominance on the Antarctic food web
1997552 citationsValerie J. Loeb, Volker Siegel et al.Natureprofile →
Krill (Euphausia superba) distribution contracts southward during rapid regional warming
2019249 citationsAngus Atkinson, Evgeny A. Pakhomov et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Volker Siegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Volker Siegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Volker Siegel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Volker Siegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Volker Siegel. The network helps show where Volker Siegel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Volker Siegel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Volker Siegel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Volker Siegel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Volker Siegel. Volker Siegel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Herr, Helena, Sacha Viquerat, Volker Siegel, et al.. (2016). Model based Humpback, Fin whale and krill distribution - results of a snapshot study from the West Antarctic Peninsula. Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut).1 indexed citations
4.
Siegel, Volker & J. L. Watkins. (2016). Distribution, biomass and demography of Antarctic krill. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).6 indexed citations
5.
Siegel, Volker. (2016). Biology and Ecology of Antarctic Krill. Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut).109 indexed citations
Atkinson, Angus, Volker Siegel, Evgeny A. Pakhomov, & P. Rothery. (2004). Long-term decline in krill stock and increase in salps within the Southern Ocean. Nature. 432(7013). 100–103.900 indexed citations breakdown →
Kim, Suam, Volker Siegel, Roger P. Hewitt, et al.. (1998). Temporal changes in marine environments in the Antarctic Peninsula area during the 1994/95 austral summer. Memoirs of National Institute of Polar Research. Special issue. 52(52). 186–208.3 indexed citations
Siegel, Volker & Uwe Harms. (1996). The composition, abundance, biomass and diversity of the epipelagic zooplankton communities of the southern Bellingshausen Sea (Antarctic) with special references to krill and salps. 44. 115–139.33 indexed citations
17.
Siegel, Volker. (1992). Assessment of the krill (Euphausia superba) spawning stock off the Antarctic Peninsula. 41(2). 101–130.25 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.