Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Marine Biology of Polar Regions and Effects of Stress on Marine Organisms.
This map shows the geographic impact of Inigo Everson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inigo Everson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inigo Everson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inigo Everson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inigo Everson. The network helps show where Inigo Everson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inigo Everson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inigo Everson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inigo Everson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Inigo Everson. Inigo Everson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Agnew, David J., et al.. (2003). Movement and growth of tagged Dissostichus eleginoides around South Georgia and Shag Rocks (subarea 48.3). NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).16 indexed citations
Ashford, J. R., et al.. (2002). Length-at-age in juvenile Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides). NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 9.6 indexed citations
7.
Everson, Inigo. (2002). Considerations of major issues in ecosystem monitoring and management. 9. 213–232.6 indexed citations
8.
Trathan, Philip N., J. L. Watkins, A. W. MURRAY, et al.. (2001). THE CCAMLR-2000 KRILL SYNOPTIC SURVEY: A DESCRIPTION OF THE RATIONALE AND DESIGN. 8. 1–23.28 indexed citations
9.
Everson, Inigo. (2000). Krill: biology, ecology and fisheries.192 indexed citations
10.
Everson, Inigo. (2000). Roles of krill in marine food webs: the Southern Ocean. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).1 indexed citations
11.
Everson, Inigo & Alexander G. Murray. (1999). Size at sexual maturity of Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides). NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).15 indexed citations
12.
Murphy, Eugene J., Philip N. Trathan, Inigo Everson, Graeme Parkes, & Francis Daunt. (1997). Krill fishing in the Scotia Sea in relation to bathymetry, including the detailed distribution around South Georgia.28 indexed citations
13.
Everson, Inigo & William K. de la Mare. (1996). SOME THOUGHTS ON PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES FOR THE KRILL FISHERY. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council).15 indexed citations
Everson, Inigo, Douglas G. Bone, J. L. Watkins, & Kenneth G. Foote. (1988). Target strengths of Antartic krill (Euphausia superba). Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).1 indexed citations
19.
Everson, Inigo. (1983). Variations in vertical distribution and density of krill swarms in the vicinity of South Georgia. Memoirs of National Institute of Polar Research. Special issue. 27. 84–92.40 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.