Virginia Garrote
- Urology top 2%
- Rheumatology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Juan Víctor Ariel FrancoValeria ViettoTarek TurkStanislav IakhnoYu‐Tian XiaoJae Hung JungCamila Micaela Escobar LiquitayAgustín Ciapponi
- Topics
- Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (8 papers)Pelvic floor disorders treatments (7 papers)Sexual function and dysfunction studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsBritish Journal of Urology
- Partner nations
- ArgentinaSyriaSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Virginia Garrote
16 papers receiving 432 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Urology 250
- Rheumatology 145
- Psychiatry and Mental health 127
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 51
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 49
Countries citing papers authored by Virginia Garrote
This map shows the geographic impact of Virginia Garrote's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Virginia Garrote with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virginia Garrote more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Virginia Garrote
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Virginia Garrote. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Virginia Garrote. The network helps show where Virginia Garrote may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Virginia Garrote
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Virginia Garrote. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Virginia Garrote based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Virginia Garrote. Virginia Garrote is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 63 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 64 | |
| 10 | 98 | |
| 11 | 49 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1 |
About Virginia Garrote
Virginia Garrote is a scholar working on Urology, Rheumatology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (8 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (7 papers) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (250 citations), Rheumatology (145 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (127 citations). Virginia Garrote has collaborated with scholars based in Argentina, Syria and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Juan Víctor Ariel Franco, Valeria Vietto, Tarek Turk, Stanislav Iakhno, Yu‐Tian Xiao, Jae Hung Jung, Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay, Agustín Ciapponi, Luis Garegnani and Iván Solà. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and British Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.