Violet Mwaffo

909 citations
46 papers · 673 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Violet Mwaffo

40 papers receiving 666 citations

Peers

Violet Mwaffo
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Cell Biology 232
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 146
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 115
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 108
  • Computer Networks and Communications 127
Replace Nicole Abaid with:
Nicole Abaid United States
Tim Landgraf Germany
Colin R. Twomey United States
Johann Delcourt Belgium
Daniel S. Calovi France
Paul Phamduy United States
Jacob M. Graving Germany
Grégory Sempo Belgium
John R.G. Dyer United Kingdom
Francisco J. H. Heras United Kingdom
Violet Mwaffo relative to Nicole Abaid United States Nicole Abaid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nicole Abaid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Violet Mwaffo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Violet Mwaffo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Violet Mwaffo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Violet Mwaffo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Violet Mwaffo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Violet Mwaffo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Violet Mwaffo. The network helps show where Violet Mwaffo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Violet Mwaffo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Violet Mwaffo Line = papers co-authored together Violet Mwaffo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201677
2 201560
3 201443
4 201643
5 201643
6 201743
7 201742
8 201428
9 201727
10 201725
11 201823
12 202123
13 201721
14 201520
15 201516
16 201816
17 201514
18 201512
19 202311
20 201510

About Violet Mwaffo

Violet Mwaffo is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Cell Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Computer Networks and Communications and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 46 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (13 papers), Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems (12 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (11 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (6 papers), Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems (6 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (5 papers), Maritime Navigation and Safety (4 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (232 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (146 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (115 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (108 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (127 citations). Violet Mwaffo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and India. Frequent co-authors include Maurizio Porfiri, Sachit Butail, Simone Macrı̀, Daniele Neri, Pietro De Lellis, T Bartolini, Ross P. Anderson, Peng Zhang, J. Sean Humbert and Franck J. Vernerey. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, IEEE Access, Scientific Reports, Zebrafish and Journal of Nonlinear Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact