Vincent Lucente

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
69 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Vincent Lucente is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery and Urology. According to data from OpenAlex, Vincent Lucente has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Rheumatology, 37 papers in Surgery and 20 papers in Urology. Recurrent topics in Vincent Lucente's work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (56 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (24 papers) and Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (23 papers). Vincent Lucente is often cited by papers focused on Pelvic floor disorders treatments (56 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (24 papers) and Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (23 papers). Vincent Lucente collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and France. Vincent Lucente's co-authors include Elizabeth McClellan, J. Thomas Benson, Miles Murphy, Heather van Raalte, John R. Miklos, Neeraj Kohli, Howard B. Goldman, Adam S. Holzberg, Vladimir Egorov and Peter K. Sand and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and The Journal of Urology.

In The Last Decade

Vincent Lucente

66 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the t... 1996 2026 2006 2016 1996 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Vincent Lucente United States 21 1.4k 1.3k 390 224 135 69 1.6k
Gordon Hosker United Kingdom 18 1.9k 1.4× 1.5k 1.2× 622 1.6× 327 1.5× 125 0.9× 45 2.1k
Mariëlla I. J. Withagen Netherlands 17 1.5k 1.1× 1.4k 1.1× 278 0.7× 217 1.0× 94 0.7× 62 1.6k
Michelle Fynes United Kingdom 21 1.2k 0.8× 1.0k 0.8× 470 1.2× 148 0.7× 224 1.7× 51 1.5k
B. Fatton France 23 2.0k 1.5× 1.8k 1.4× 501 1.3× 258 1.2× 94 0.7× 98 2.2k
Ursula Peschers Germany 21 1.3k 0.9× 902 0.7× 505 1.3× 267 1.2× 162 1.2× 47 1.5k
Veronica Mallett United States 13 974 0.7× 652 0.5× 393 1.0× 337 1.5× 54 0.4× 27 1.1k
Andrew F. Hundley United States 15 1.1k 0.8× 963 0.8× 165 0.4× 178 0.8× 211 1.6× 36 1.4k
Megan O. Schimpf United States 20 606 0.4× 643 0.5× 280 0.7× 124 0.6× 167 1.2× 49 938
John O.L. DeLancey United States 12 1.1k 0.8× 976 0.8× 230 0.6× 152 0.7× 91 0.7× 19 1.3k
Christina Lewicky‐Gaupp United States 22 1.1k 0.8× 1.0k 0.8× 291 0.7× 248 1.1× 165 1.2× 106 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Vincent Lucente

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vincent Lucente's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vincent Lucente with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vincent Lucente more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vincent Lucente

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vincent Lucente. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vincent Lucente. The network helps show where Vincent Lucente may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vincent Lucente

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vincent Lucente. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vincent Lucente based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vincent Lucente. Vincent Lucente is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Eilber, Karyn S., et al.. (2025). Expert Opinions on Best Practices for Overactive Bladder Management with onabotulinumtoxinA. Toxins. 17(4). 207–207.
3.
Egorov, Vladimir, S. Abbas Shobeiri, Péter Takács, et al.. (2018). Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Prolapse versus Normal Conditions. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 8(10). 900–924. 17 indexed citations
5.
Raalte, Heather van, et al.. (2015). PRESSURE MAPPING OF VOLUNTARY AND INVOLUNTARY MUSCLE CONTRACTION FOR ASSESSMENT OF SUI CONDITIONS. 1 indexed citations
6.
Murphy, Miles, et al.. (2014). One-Year Functional and Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Extraperitoneal Colpopexy With Mesh. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery. 21(2). 87–92. 11 indexed citations
7.
Raalte, Heather van, et al.. (2013). 3D tactile imaging in early prolapse detection. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 3 indexed citations
8.
Lucente, Vincent, et al.. (2011). Efficacy and Tolerability of Solifenacin in Patients Aged ⩾ 65 Years with Overactive Bladder: Post-Hoc Analysis of 2 Open-Label Studies. Postgraduate Medicine. 123(1). 94–104. 11 indexed citations
9.
Lucente, Vincent, et al.. (2011). Prospective Clinical Assessment of the Transvaginal Mesh Technique for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse-5-Year Results. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery. 17(3). 139–143. 30 indexed citations
10.
11.
Lucente, Vincent, et al.. (2010). ONE YEAR RESULTS FROM A WORLD-WIDE REGISTRY OF TVT-SECUR™ IN WOMEN WITH STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE (SUI). Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2 indexed citations
12.
Lucente, Vincent, et al.. (2010). Efficacy of Solifenacin on Symptom Bother and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Acute, Early Chronic, and Late Chronic Overactive Bladder. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery. 16(6). 320–326.
13.
Lucente, Vincent, et al.. (2008). One-year anatomic and quality-of-life outcomes after the Prolift procedure for treatment of posthysterectomy prolapse. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 199(6). 694.e1–694.e6. 59 indexed citations
14.
Murphy, Miles, et al.. (2008). Quality of life and surgical satisfaction after vaginal reconstructive vs obliterative surgery for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 198(5). 573.e1–573.e7. 50 indexed citations
15.
Murphy, Miles, et al.. (2007). Incontinence-related quality of life and sexual function following the tension-free vaginal tape versus the “inside–out” tension-free vaginal tape obturator. International Urogynecology Journal. 19(4). 481–487. 47 indexed citations
16.
Lucente, Vincent, et al.. (2000). Using a SANE Interdisciplinary Approach to Care of Sexual Assault Victims. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement. 26(8). 488–496. 26 indexed citations
17.
Mattox, T. Fleming, Vincent Lucente, Patrick J. McIntyre, John R. Miklos, & Janet Tomezsko. (2000). Abnormal spinal curvature and its relationship to pelvic organ prolapse. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 183(6). 1381–1384. 57 indexed citations
18.
Miklos, John R., Neeraj Kohli, Vincent Lucente, & William B. Saye. (1998). Site-specific fascial defects in the diagnosis and surgical management of enterocele. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 179(6). 1418–1423. 58 indexed citations
19.
Dupree, William B., et al.. (1998). The promise and risk of a new technology. Cancer. 84(4). 202–207. 45 indexed citations
20.
Benson, J. Thomas, Vincent Lucente, & Elizabeth McClellan. (1996). Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 175(6). 1418–1422. 427 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026