Victoria Pennick
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Claire BombardierAndrea D FurlanMaurits W. van TulderDianne LiddleGavin YoungCarlo AmmendoliaCarol KennedyIvan Steenstra
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers)Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers)
- Cited by
- PharmacologyPathology and Forensic MedicinePublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Partner nations
- CanadaNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Victoria Pennick
12 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Pharmacology 1.0k
- Surgery 720
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 676
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 639
- Cell Biology 175
Countries citing papers authored by Victoria Pennick
This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria Pennick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria Pennick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria Pennick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Victoria Pennick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria Pennick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria Pennick. The network helps show where Victoria Pennick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Victoria Pennick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Victoria Pennick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Victoria Pennick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Victoria Pennick. Victoria Pennick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 216 | |
| 2 | 168 | |
| 3 | 118 | |
| 4 | 83 | |
| 5 | 2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Groupbreakdown → | 1385 |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 89 | |
| 8 | 102 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 116 | |
| 12 | 5 |
About Victoria Pennick
Victoria Pennick is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 12 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (1.0k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (676 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (639 citations). Victoria Pennick has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Claire Bombardier, Andrea D Furlan, Maurits W. van Tulder, Dianne Liddle, Gavin Young, Carlo Ammendolia, Carol Kennedy, Ivan Steenstra, Willem JJ Assendelft and Kent Stuber. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Spine and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.