Véronique Fraser
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Epidemiology
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Nicholas B. KingSam HarperConstantina BoikosRobin RichardsonLisa SchwartzMatthew HuntSonya de LaatThomas J. Stipanowich
- Topics
- Ethics in medical practice (3 papers)Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers)Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Anesthesiology and Pain MedicinePublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthToxicology
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Véronique Fraser
8 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 228
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 98
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 89
- Epidemiology 88
- General Health Professions 55
Countries citing papers authored by Véronique Fraser
This map shows the geographic impact of Véronique Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Véronique Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Véronique Fraser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Véronique Fraser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Véronique Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Véronique Fraser. The network helps show where Véronique Fraser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Véronique Fraser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Véronique Fraser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Véronique Fraser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Véronique Fraser. Véronique Fraser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Access to Commercial Justice: A Roadmap for Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Design for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses (SMEs) Disputes | 4 |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | The International Task Force On Mixed Mode Dispute Resolution: Exploring The Interplay Between Mediation, Evaluation And Arbitration In Commercial Cases | 2 |
| 5 | Legal Design Lawyering: Rebooting Legal Business Model with Design Thinking | 1 |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 230 | |
| 8 | 66 | |
| 9 | 14 |
About Véronique Fraser
Véronique Fraser is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers) and Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (98 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (228 citations) and Toxicology (18 citations). Véronique Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas B. King, Sam Harper, Constantina Boikos, Robin Richardson, Lisa Schwartz, Matthew Hunt, Sonya de Laat, Thomas J. Stipanowich and Andrea Schneider. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Public Health, PLoS Medicine and Journal of Medical Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.