Venkat Ramakrishnan

2.2k total citations
91 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Venkat Ramakrishnan is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Venkat Ramakrishnan has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 83 papers in Surgery, 10 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 9 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Venkat Ramakrishnan's work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (65 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (32 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (25 papers). Venkat Ramakrishnan is often cited by papers focused on Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (65 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (32 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (25 papers). Venkat Ramakrishnan collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Italy. Venkat Ramakrishnan's co-authors include Andrea Figus, Nakul Patel, Warren M. Rozen, W. M. Chan, Bhagwat Mathur, Matthew Griffiths, Niri S. Niranjan, Edmund Fitzgerald O’Connor, Corrado Rubino and Afshin Mosahebi and has published in prestigious journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Urology and SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series.

In The Last Decade

Venkat Ramakrishnan

84 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Venkat Ramakrishnan United Kingdom 21 1.3k 201 147 123 107 91 1.4k
Andrea Figus Italy 22 1.1k 0.9× 75 0.4× 193 1.3× 67 0.5× 59 0.6× 69 1.3k
Eric G. Halvorson United States 23 995 0.8× 54 0.3× 140 1.0× 128 1.0× 79 0.7× 54 1.3k
Nicholas T. Haddock United States 26 1.8k 1.5× 114 0.6× 277 1.9× 234 1.9× 97 0.9× 120 2.0k
Nicolas Reina France 27 1.7k 1.4× 134 0.7× 160 1.1× 95 0.8× 44 0.4× 131 2.2k
Ryan Garcia United States 22 922 0.7× 68 0.3× 199 1.4× 176 1.4× 32 0.3× 48 1.3k
Alexander F. Mericli United States 16 727 0.6× 68 0.3× 66 0.4× 94 0.8× 56 0.5× 93 840
Goo‐Hyun Mun South Korea 26 1.9k 1.5× 85 0.4× 426 2.9× 173 1.4× 39 0.4× 157 2.2k
Anuja K. Antony United States 18 1.1k 0.8× 117 0.6× 91 0.6× 81 0.7× 38 0.4× 46 1.3k
Joshua A. Parry United States 21 1.0k 0.8× 67 0.3× 249 1.7× 73 0.6× 337 3.1× 137 1.4k
David A. Kulber United States 16 757 0.6× 74 0.4× 71 0.5× 46 0.4× 72 0.7× 70 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Venkat Ramakrishnan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Venkat Ramakrishnan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Venkat Ramakrishnan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Venkat Ramakrishnan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Venkat Ramakrishnan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Venkat Ramakrishnan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Venkat Ramakrishnan. The network helps show where Venkat Ramakrishnan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Venkat Ramakrishnan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Venkat Ramakrishnan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Venkat Ramakrishnan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Venkat Ramakrishnan. Venkat Ramakrishnan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hansson, Emma, et al.. (2023). A systematic review of the scientific evidence of venous supercharging in autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 21(1). 379–379. 2 indexed citations
2.
Hussain, Amer, et al.. (2023). Internal mammary perforator vessels as recipient for microvascular breast reconstruction: Technique and outcomes in 161 flaps. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 85. 454–462.
3.
Morgan, Mary S., et al.. (2023). Primary lipofilling as an adjunct in transverse upper gracilis flap breast reconstruction. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 86. 1–7. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ramakrishnan, Venkat, et al.. (2022). Proving Ground Durability Test Schedule Development for Electrified Vehicle Drivelines Using Virtual Simulations. SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility. 5(1). 162–173. 1 indexed citations
5.
Ramakrishnan, Venkat, et al.. (2022). Stacked TUG and DIEP flaps to reconstruct a single breast: Expanding the scope of autologous breast reconstruction. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 75(9). 2974–2981. 3 indexed citations
6.
Joji, Nikita, et al.. (2021). Aesthetic Surgery Practice Resumption in the United Kingdom During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 42(4). 435–443. 2 indexed citations
7.
Patel, Nakul, et al.. (2021). Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 75(3). 1164–1170. 7 indexed citations
9.
Ramakrishnan, Venkat, et al.. (2020). Comparison of PEAK PlasmaBlade™ to conventional diathermy in abdominal-based free-flap breast reconstruction surgery—A single-centre double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 74(8). 1731–1742. 4 indexed citations
10.
Patel, Nakul & Venkat Ramakrishnan. (2020). Microsurgical Tissue Transfer in Breast Reconstruction. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 47(4). 595–609. 9 indexed citations
11.
Rozen, Warren M., et al.. (2019). Risk factors and timing of postoperative hematomas following microvascular breast reconstruction: A prospective cohort study. Microsurgery. 40(2). 99–103. 10 indexed citations
13.
Figus, Andrea, et al.. (2013). Post-operative assessment of perfusion of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) free flaps via Pulsatility Index (PI) using a portable colour Doppler sonogram device. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 66(7). 931–936. 10 indexed citations
14.
Ramakrishnan, Venkat, et al.. (2012). Microsurgical reconstruction of complicated extended latissimus dorsi flap donor sites: A report of three cases. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 65(12). 1660–1663. 2 indexed citations
15.
Chan, W. M., et al.. (2011). Developmental Breast Asymmetry. The Breast Journal. 17(4). 391–398. 20 indexed citations
16.
Gravvanis, Andreas, et al.. (2009). Management of Inguinal Lymphadenopathy. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 63(3). 307–310. 12 indexed citations
17.
Ramakrishnan, Venkat, et al.. (2007). Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: Microsurgical methods. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery. 40(12). 82. 3 indexed citations
18.
Ahmed, Osama, et al.. (2002). V-Y advancement flap and composite graft for alar-groove reconstruction. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 55(1). 8–11. 7 indexed citations
19.
Ramakrishnan, Venkat, et al.. (2002). Lymphoedema of the eyelids. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 55(2). 153–154. 4 indexed citations
20.
Southern, Stephen & Venkat Ramakrishnan. (1998). Dexter: A device for the assessment of microsurgical instrumentation and instruction of trainees. Microsurgery. 18(7). 430–431. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026